GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-6 Sol 
Qwen3.7 Plus Verdict
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.7 vs 59.4.
- GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.6× cheaper ($1.13 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
- GPT-6 Sol (max) streams 1.9× faster (126 vs 65 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (max) | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 67.7 | 59.4 |
| Composite score | 86.2 | 59.3 |
| Knowledge score | 75.4 | 63.4 |
| Long context score | 67.7 | 62.2 |
| Multimodal score | 67.1 | 63.5 |
| Reasoning score | 95.0 | 61.7 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 45.2 |
| Coding score | – | 46.2 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 75.6 |
| Maths score | – | 65.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $1.13 |
| Output speed | 126 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 107.2 s | 33.0 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 93.3% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | – | 2.8% |
| SciCode | – | 45.5% |
| FrontierCode | – | 10.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 147.4 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1456 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1473 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1501 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1278 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -6.1 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 47.5 | 25.2 |
| IFBench | – | 78.0% |
| AA-LCR | 83.7% | 73.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.3% | 80.5% |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.1 | 1.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 47.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 90.0% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 47.9% | 35.6% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.6% | 46.1% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 93.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 52.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 38.6 |
| CritPt | 30.9% | 9.1% |
| GDPval (AA) | 49.4% | 12.8% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 17.5% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 22.4% |
| Code Migration | – | 12.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 49.4% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 38.2% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 0.0% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 16.4% |
| MortgageTax | – | 66.2% |
| SAGE | – | 39.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 54.3% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 53.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 46.4% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1466 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1432 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1447 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1465 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1465 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1453 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 24.0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | – | 17.0% |
| LMCA | – | 37.6% |
| DTBench | – | 84.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 43.9% | 1.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 61.0% |
| AutomationBench | 61.6% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 24.8% | – |
| MLCR | 16.1% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.5% | 22.5% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 39.9% | 72.3% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1483 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus: questions
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.7 vs 59.4. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper: $1.13 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?
- GPT-6 Sol streams faster: 126 against 65 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.