Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Grok 4.7 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads on quality: 64.3 vs 62.5.
- Grok 4.7 (xhigh) is stronger in coding, knowledge.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in agents & tools, composite, long context, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper ($0.548 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro streams 1.4× faster (54 vs 39 tokens per second).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (xhigh) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.5 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 50.5 | 55.1 |
| Coding score | 64.7 | – |
| Composite score | 71.2 | 84.8 |
| Knowledge score | 71.6 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 64.1 | 69.1 |
| Reasoning score | 73.0 | 88.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 39 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 0.9 s | 39.8 s |
| Context window | 500k | 1.0M |
| Terminal-Bench | 37.6% | – |
| SciCode | 57.4% | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | – |
| LiveBench | 77.4% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 82.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 77.2% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 54.0% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 95.7% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 76.9% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 80.1% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.5 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 76.7% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 32.0 | 8.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 43.1% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.4% | 60.9% |
| IOI | 57.7% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.4% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 73.4% | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | 60.2 | 59.7 |
| CritPt | 17.7% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 59.8% | 58.7% |
| BioMysteryBench | 69.3% | – |
| Code Migration | 44.8% | 43.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 67.0% | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 52.3% | 58.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 12.5% | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | 47.1% | 47.1% |
| MedCode | 49.5% | – |
| MedScribe | 89.4% | – |
| MysteryMechanism | 25.2% | – |
| ProgramBench | 0.5% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 65.6% | – |
| SAGE | 40.8% | – |
| Tax Agent Bench | 65.6% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 28.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 11.4% | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 86.2% | 85.2% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 25.8% | 34.9% |
| AutomationBench | 65.6% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 20.0% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | 15.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 47.5% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 70.7% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1657 | 1522 |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads on quality: 64.3 vs 62.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in agentic tasks (55 vs 51 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro streams faster: 54 against 39 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 500k tokens.