MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 are level on quality (64.3 vs 64.8).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, long context, reasoning.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, knowledge, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.6× cheaper ($0.548 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 3.9× faster (210 vs 54 tokens per second).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.3 | 64.8 |
| Agents & tools score | 55.1 | 60.4 |
| Composite score | 84.8 | – |
| Knowledge score | 66.8 | 70.5 |
| Long context score | 69.1 | – |
| Reasoning score | 88.8 | 69.3 |
| Coding score | – | 67.9 |
| Human preference score | – | 66.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.8 |
| Maths score | – | 62.8 |
| Multimodal score | – | 64.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.548 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 54 tok/s | 210 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 39.8 s | 2.8 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 57.8% |
| SciCode | – | 58.8% |
| ProofBench | – | 39.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 154.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1513 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1542 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1294 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | – |
| AA-LCR | 86.3% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 8.4 | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 49.4% | – |
| SciCode (AA) | 60.9% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.8% | – |
| Vals Index | 59.7 | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 57.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.6% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1260 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | – |
| GDPval (AA) | 58.7% | – |
| Code Migration | 43.0% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 62.9% | – |
| Finance Agent v2 | 58.3% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 10.8% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 47.1% | – |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 2.9% | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 85.2% | – |
| FORTRESS | – | 12.4% |
| SWE-Bench Pro (private) | – | 61.5% |
| VTB | – | 44.8% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1451 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1471 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1497 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1481 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1480 |
| DeepSWE | – | 53.3% |
| GBAEval | – | 7.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | – | 6520.5 |
| GDP.pdf | – | 15.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 34.9% | – |
| AutomationBench | 58.6% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 19.2% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 34.9% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 59.4% | – |
| AA-Briefcase | 1522 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions
- Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 are level on quality (64.3 vs 64.8). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1 for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in agentic tasks (60 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 210 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1.0M tokens of context.