MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MiMo-V2.6-Pro 
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Verdict
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (max) leads on quality: 65.9 vs 64.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper ($0.548 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro streams 1.4× faster (54 vs 39 tokens per second).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.3 | 65.9 |
| Agents & tools score | 55.1 | 68.0 |
| Composite score | 84.8 | 72.1 |
| Knowledge score | 66.8 | 63.1 |
| Long context score | 69.1 | 66.0 |
| Reasoning score | 88.8 | 74.1 |
| Coding score | – | 66.1 |
| Human preference score | – | 68.3 |
| Maths score | – | 67.1 |
| Multimodal score | – | 67.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.548 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 54 tok/s | 39 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 39.8 s | 55.1 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| SciCode | – | 52.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1481 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1503 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1522 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1671 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1315 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 3.3 |
| LiveBench | – | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 74.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | 45.4 |
| AA-LCR | 86.3% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 82.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 8.4 | 12.0 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 49.4% | 43.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 60.9% | 53.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.6% |
| IOI | – | 68.9% |
| LegalBench | – | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.8% | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | 59.7 | 51.8 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 58.7% | 58.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 51.3% |
| Code Migration | 43.0% | 24.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 62.9% | 60.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 58.3% | 50.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 10.8% | 10.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | 47.1% | 47.6% |
| MedCode | – | 40.7% |
| MedScribe | – | 85.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 88.0% |
| MortgageTax | – | 64.0% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 23.9% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 67.1% |
| SAGE | – | 51.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 42.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 66.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 24.8% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 65.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 12.8% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 85.2% | 64.7% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1498 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1472 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1477 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1495 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1492 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 34.9% | 38.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| AutomationBench | 58.6% | 56.2% |
| GDP.pdf | 19.2% | 22.8% |
| MLCR | – | 20.0% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 34.9% | 31.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 59.4% | 71.2% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1522 | 1640 |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): questions
- Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (max) leads on quality: 65.9 vs 64.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro streams faster: 54 against 39 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.