BenchLeader

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Verdict
  • Muse Spark 1.3 leads on quality: 68.3 vs 59.0.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in agents & tools, coding, multimodal.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 8.7× cheaper ($0.230 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
  • Muse Spark 1.3 streams 4.8× faster (241 vs 51 tokens per second).
MetricMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
BenchLeader Index68.359.0
Composite score90.367.5
Knowledge score79.159.8
Long context score68.266.5
Agents & tools score48.0
Coding score71.2
Multimodal score64.5
Blended price $/M$2.00$0.230
Output speed241 tok/s51 tok/s
Time to first answer30.5 s42.2 s
Context window1.0M256k
LMArena WebDev1635
LMArena Agent0.4
LiveBench76.2%
LiveBench Reasoning87.4%
LiveBench Coding72.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding61.6%
LiveBench Mathematics85.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis74.2%
LiveBench Language74.6%
AA Intelligence Index48.239.9
AA-LCR83.0%79.7%
MMMU-Pro79.8%
AA-Omniscience25-9.7
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.5%92.3%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%38.0%
SciCode (AA)58.8%50.6%
PRBench Finance59.5%
PRBench Legal61.6%

Data as of 2026-09-14. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Muse Spark 1.3 leads on quality: 68.3 vs 59.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.3 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-14, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is cheaper: $0.230 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Muse Spark 1.3 streams faster: 241 against 51 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.0M against 256k tokens.