BenchLeader

Qwen3 8 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Verdict
  • Qwen3 8 (max) leads on quality: 66.5 vs 61.6.
  • Qwen3 8 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in coding.
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 12× cheaper ($0.230 vs $2.67 per 1M blended).
  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next streams 1.4× faster (55 vs 39 tokens per second).
MetricQwen3 8 (max)Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
BenchLeader Index66.561.6
Agents & tools score68.365.8
Coding score66.571.2
Composite score74.367.4
Human preference score68.2
Knowledge score63.559.6
Long context score66.666.3
Maths score67.0
Multimodal score67.464.3
Reasoning score76.363.4
Blended price $/M$2.67$0.230
Output speed39 tok/s55 tok/s
Time to first answer55.1 s39.0 s
Context window1M256k
SciCode52.9%
ProofBench58.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6
LMArena Text1481
LMArena Hard Prompts1503
LMArena Coding1522
LMArena WebDev16711635
LMArena Vision1315
LMArena Agent3.3-0.1
LiveBench78.5%76.2%
LiveBench Reasoning88.2%87.4%
LiveBench Coding72.9%72.5%
LiveBench Agentic Coding64.7%61.6%
LiveBench Mathematics91.3%85.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.4%74.2%
LiveBench Language79.7%74.6%
LiveBench Instruction Following74.1%77.1%
AA Intelligence Index45.439.9
AA-LCR80.3%79.7%
MMMU-Pro82.8%79.8%
AA-Omniscience12.0-9.7
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.8%92.3%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)43.1%38.0%
SciCode (AA)53.2%50.6%
LiveCodeBench87.8%
MMLU-Pro88.6%
IOI68.9%
LegalBench83.6%
CorpFin65.8%
TaxEval75.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)67.4%
SWE-bench (Vals)85.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)93.7%
Vals Index51.8
CritPt20.0%11.1%
GDPval (AA)58.2%57.4%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)51.3%45.4%
Code Migration24.0%
Excel Modeling Benchmark60.1%
Finance Agent v250.6%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark10.4%
Legal Research Bench47.6%
MedCode40.7%
MedScribe85.0%
MMMU-Pro (Vals)88.0%
MortgageTax64.0%
MysteryMechanism23.9%
ProgramBench0.0%
Public Benefits Bench67.1%
SAGE51.3%
SkillsBench42.0%
Tax Agent Bench66.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)24.8%
Terminal-Bench Science1.4%
Vals Multimodal Index65.4%
Vibe Code Bench 1-10012.8%
Vibe Code Bench v1.164.7%
LMArena Maths1498
LMArena Creative Writing1472
LMArena Instruction Following1477
LMArena Multi-turn1495
LMArena Longer Queries1492

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Qwen3 8 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: questions

Is Qwen3 8 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Qwen3 8 (max) leads on quality: 66.5 vs 61.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3 8 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Qwen3 8 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for coding?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores higher in coding (71 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is Qwen3 8 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for agentic tasks?
Qwen3 8 scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 8 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is cheaper: $0.230 against $2.67 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Qwen3 8 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next streams faster: 55 against 39 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen3 8 accepts more context: 1M against 256k tokens.