Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Claude Fable 5 
MiMo-V2.6-Flash Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 (max) leads on quality: 69.1 vs 59.7.
- Claude Fable 5 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is stronger in human preference, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 114× cheaper ($0.175 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (max) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 69.1 | 59.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 65.0 | 55.5 |
| Coding score | 74.1 | 60.1 |
| Composite score | 79.8 | 72.5 |
| Instruction following score | 63.0 | – |
| Knowledge score | 81.2 | 56.0 |
| Long context score | 66.4 | 62.3 |
| Maths score | 73.0 | 63.4 |
| Reasoning score | 74.0 | 62.5 |
| Human preference score | – | 64.0 |
| Multimodal score | – | 57.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $0.175 |
| Output speed | 65 tok/s | 58 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 117.7 s | 38.1 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 87.0% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.2% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 44.5% | – |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | – |
| SciCode | 61.0% | 51.3% |
| WeirdML | 91.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 95.0% | 63.0% |
| LMArena Text | – | 1451 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1484 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1514 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1637 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1259 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 0.4 |
| LiveBench | 83.0% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 86.0% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 62.2% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.0% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 80.5% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 90.7% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 49.6 | 37.9 |
| IFBench | 63.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | 74.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 73.1% |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | -12.7 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | 35.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | 51.3% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | – |
| IOI | – | 47.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 76.4% |
| Vals Index | – | 53.2 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | – |
| CritPt | 28.6% | 12.0% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 55.6% | 55.5% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | 38.1% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 48.8% | – |
| BioMysteryBench | – | 69.3% |
| Code Migration | – | 40.9% |
| CyberBench | – | 75.4% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 65.5% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 56.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 11.3% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 38.0% |
| MedCode | – | 41.1% |
| MedScribe | – | 85.3% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 21.6% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 67.6% |
| SAGE | – | 43.5% |
| SREBench | – | 4.2% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 59.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 24.2% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 4.3% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 79.0% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1462 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1387 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1451 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1452 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1463 |
| Chess Puzzles | 41.0% | – |
| EBR-bench | 39.5% | – |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 52.0% | – |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | – |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 69.7% | – |
| LMCA | 60.3% | – |
| DTBench | 98.4% | – |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4966.6 | – |
| GDP.pdf | 29.8% | – |
| FrontierSWE | 47.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 42.4% | 22.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 84.6% | – |
| AutomationBench | 54.1% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 24.0% | – |
| MLCR | 64.4% | – |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | 51.1% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 65.3% | 27.0% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 36.4% | 45.6% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1540 | – |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: questions
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
- Claude Fable 5 (max) leads on quality: 69.1 vs 59.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?
- Claude Fable 5 scores higher in coding (74 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for agentic tasks?
- Claude Fable 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (65 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper: $0.175 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
- Claude Fable 5 streams faster: 65 against 58 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.