Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Claude Sonnet 5.5 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) leads on quality: 67.6 vs 64.8.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, maths, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, human preference, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 7.3× cheaper ($0.548 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) streams 3.3× faster (141 vs 43 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 67.6 | 64.8 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.5 | 56.5 |
| Coding score | 69.8 | 62.0 |
| Composite score | 72.6 | 82.1 |
| Knowledge score | 65.4 | 65.5 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 68.5 |
| Maths score | 72.9 | 66.1 |
| Reasoning score | 81.1 | 79.6 |
| Human preference score | – | 67.7 |
| Multimodal score | – | 60.1 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 141 tok/s | 43 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 487.1 s | 51.1 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 88.8% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 61.8% | – |
| SciCode | 61.0% | 60.9% |
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | 59.5% |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 70.0% |
| LMArena Text | – | 1480 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1506 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1539 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1629 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1264 |
| LMArena Agent | 12 | 3.5 |
| LiveBench | 75.7% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.6% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 91.4% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 56.3% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.1% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 59.5% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 78.0% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 56.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 56 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 82.7% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 32.3 | 8.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.0% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | 60.9% |
| IOI | – | 39.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 55.2 |
| CritPt | 31.4% | 26.6% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 67.0% | 59.2% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 57.5% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 43.0% |
| CyberBench | – | 72.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 57.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.1% |
| MedCode | – | 45.0% |
| MedScribe | – | 88.3% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 15.3% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 68.9% |
| SAGE | – | 45.0% |
| SREBench | – | 3.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 64.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 31.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.2% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1448 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1456 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1495 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65.0% | – |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | – |
| ALE-Bench | – | 1158.1 |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 63.6% | 34.9% |
| AutomationBench | 71.8% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 25.8% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | 75.0% | 18.3% |
| Harvey LAB | 2.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.0% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 53.0% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1823 | 1516 |
| AA Openness Index | – | 52.8 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) leads on quality: 67.6 vs 64.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in coding (70 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (70 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.548 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 streams faster: 141 against 43 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.