Deepseek v4 Pro High vs Gemini 4 Argon
Deepseek v4 Pro High 
Gemini 4 Argon Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.0.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in coding, human preference, maths, reasoning, agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context.
| Metric | Deepseek v4 Pro High (high) | Gemini 4 Argon (high) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.0 | 70.0 |
| Coding score | 57.2 | 72.1 |
| Human preference score | 65.7 | 73.2 |
| Maths score | 65.2 | 71.9 |
| Reasoning score | 65.4 | 82.0 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 67.5 |
| Composite score | – | 89.2 |
| Knowledge score | – | 75.7 |
| Long context score | – | 65.0 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $4.00 |
| Context window | – | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | – |
| SciCode | 46.4% | 61.8% |
| WeirdML | 46.5% | – |
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1525 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1551 |
| LMArena Coding | 1506 | 1562 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | 1678 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 9.3 |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | – | 52.6 |
| AA-LCR | – | 79.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 42.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 57.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 61.8% |
| IOI | – | 100.0% |
| LegalBench | – | 88.3% |
| Vals Index | – | 68.9 |
| CritPt | – | 27.1% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | – | 56.3% |
| BioMysteryBench | – | 76.3% |
| Code Migration | – | 68.2% |
| CUA-bench | – | 4.8% |
| CyberBench | – | 77.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 75.2% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 65.4% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 19.6% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 54.8% |
| MedCode | – | 58.8% |
| MedScribe | – | 87.4% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 45.5% |
| ProgramBench | – | 2.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 69.8% |
| SAGE | – | 53.6% |
| SREBench | – | 44.3% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 76.2% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 57.6% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 44.3% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 91.9% |
| LMArena Maths | 1466 | 1528 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1519 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | 1529 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1472 | 1553 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1475 | 1545 |
| Chess Puzzles | 13.0% | – |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | – |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40.0% | – |
| ALE-Bench | 1006.1 | – |
| FrontierSWE | – | 55.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | – | 57.1% |
| AutomationBench | – | 77.5% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 21.8% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | – | 49.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | – | 84.9% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | – | 1488 |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Deepseek v4 Pro High vs Gemini 4 Argon: questions
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro High better than Gemini 4 Argon?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 60.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro High better than Gemini 4 Argon for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).