GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
GPT-5.4 Pro 
Qwen3.6 Plus Verdict
- GPT-5.4 Pro leads on quality: 64.3 vs 58.0.
- GPT-5.4 Pro is stronger in knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is stronger in instruction following, agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, long context, maths.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is 60× cheaper ($1.13 vs $67.50 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3.6 Plus streams 56.4× faster (56 vs 1 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.3 | 58.0 |
| Instruction following score | 67.3 | 69.9 |
| Knowledge score | 73.6 | 58.2 |
| Multimodal score | 69.8 | 61.0 |
| Reasoning score | 75.3 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 54.6 |
| Coding score | – | 52.7 |
| Composite score | – | 45.5 |
| Human preference score | – | 63.8 |
| Long context score | – | 63.1 |
| Maths score | – | 56.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $67.50 | $1.13 |
| Output speed | 1 tok/s | 56 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 6.3 s | 100.5 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 88.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 38.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 93.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 57.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 44.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | – |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | – |
| SciCode | – | 40.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.9 | 147.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1444 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1468 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1495 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1461 |
| LiveBench | – | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 75.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 78.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 41.4% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 83.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 69.9% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 75.0% |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 27.0 |
| IFBench | – | 75.2% |
| AA-LCR | – | 78.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 78.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 0.9 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 88.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 27.9% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 97.7% |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 94.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 86.0% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 87.7% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.2% |
| CorpFin | – | 61.9% |
| TaxEval | – | 74.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 53.2% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 73.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 87.4% |
| Vals Index | – | 32.0 |
| MultiChallenge | 69.2% | – |
| VISTA | 53.9% | – |
| MultiNRC | 62.3% | – |
| TutorBench | 56.6% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus: questions
- Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
- GPT-5.4 Pro leads on quality: 64.3 vs 58.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper: $1.13 against $67.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Qwen3.6 Plus streams faster: 56 against 1 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.