BenchLeader

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1

Verdict
  • GPT-6.1 Sol (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 63.1.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in instruction following.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is 2.0× cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
  • Muse Spark 1.1 streams 3.6× faster (201 vs 56 tokens per second).
MetricGPT-6.1 Sol (max)Muse Spark 1.1
BenchLeader Index69.363.1
Agents & tools score63.951.5
Coding score72.466.6
Composite score79.0–
Human preference score68.165.7
Knowledge score78.870.3
Long context score66.8–
Maths score72.561.9
Multimodal score66.263.8
Reasoning score76.468.4
Instruction following score–74.2
Blended price $/M$4.00$2.00
Output speed56 tok/s201 tok/s
Time to first answer326.9 s1.9 s
Context window1.1M1.0M
GPQA Diamond95.4%–
FrontierMath Tiers 1–393.7%–
FrontierMath Tier 4100.0%–
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%–
SimpleQA Verified73.9%57.8%
Terminal-Bench58.2%–
SciCode54.2%58.8%
APEX-Agents60.0%31.8%
ProofBench–39.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index–154.2
LMArena Text14841491
LMArena Hard Prompts15071511
LMArena Coding15451533
LMArena WebDev17551542
LMArena Vision12881293
LMArena Agent11.7-5
LiveBench81.6%–
LiveBench Reasoning92.6%–
LiveBench Coding80.4%–
LiveBench Agentic Coding54.5%–
LiveBench Mathematics96.8%–
LiveBench Data Analysis82.7%–
LiveBench Language90.1%–
LiveBench Instruction Following74.2%–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.251.8–
AA-LCR83.0%–
MMMU-Pro86.0%–
AA-Omniscience41.5–
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)52.9%–
SciCode (AA)54.2%–
IOI96.9%–
Vals Index61.1–
SWE-Bench Pro–61.5%
MCP Atlas–88.1%
MultiChallenge–75.3%
PRBench Finance–55.0%
PRBench Legal–57.0%
MultiNRC–65.6%
EQ-Bench 4–1260
ARC-AGI-196.5%–
ARC-AGI-294.2%–
ARC-AGI-396.2%–
CritPt31.7%–
GDPval-AA v2.153.8%–
Analyst Agent (AA)50.0%–
BioMysteryBench79.6%–
Code Migration65.1%–
CyberBench39.3%–
Excel Modeling Benchmark70.8%–
Finance Agent v252.0%–
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark5.4%–
Legal Research Bench38.5%–
MedCode48.8%–
MedScribe86.5%–
MysteryMechanism46.4%–
Public Benefits Bench59.3%–
SAGE46.5%–
SREBench50.8%–
Tax Agent Bench62.3%–
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)55.0%–
Vibe Code Bench v1.188.9%–
FORTRESS–12.4%
SWE-Bench Pro (private)–61.5%
LMArena Maths14881495
LMArena Creative Writing14621445
LMArena Instruction Following14881472
LMArena Multi-turn14871497
LMArena Longer Queries14961481
LMArena Document–1480
Chess Puzzles61.0%–
EBR-bench54.3%–
Mystery Game Puzzles80.0%–
DeepSWE v1.1–53.3%
GBAEval–7.9%
Vending-Bench 2–6520.5
GDP.pdf–15.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)56.1%–
AutomationBench64.9%–
GDP.pdf31.0%–
MLCR33.9%–
Harvey LAB6.9%–
AA-Omniscience: accuracy62.1%–
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination45.7%–
AA-Briefcase v1.11557–

Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Muse Spark 1.1?
GPT-6.1 Sol (max) leads on quality: 69.3 vs 63.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6.1 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in coding (72 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Muse Spark 1.1 for agentic tasks?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in agentic tasks (64 vs 52 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper: $2.00 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, GPT-6.1 Sol or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 201 against 56 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 1.0M tokens.