Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.8 Max
As of 13 Oct 2026, Muse Wonder (max) leads on quality (66.3 vs 64.1 on the BenchLeader Index), but Qwen3.8 Max (max) costs 2.7× less, so it is the better buy unless you need the extra quality.
Muse Wonder 
Qwen3.8 Max Key differences
- Muse Wonder (max) leads on quality: 66.3 vs 64.1.
- Muse Wonder (max) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
- Qwen3.8 Max (max) is 2.7× cheaper ($3.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Wonder (max) streams 2.3× faster (85 vs 36 tokens per second).
Choose Muse Wonder (max) if
- reasoning is the priority (88 vs 72 on the category score)
- knowledge is the priority (73 vs 63 on the category score)
- you need fast output: 85 against 36 tokens per second
Choose Qwen3.8 Max (max) if
- cost matters: $3.00 against $8.00 per million tokens blended
Category by category
Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.
| Category | Muse Wonder (max) | Qwen3.8 Max (max) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 87.8 | 71.9 | Muse Wonder |
| Coding | – | 64.6 | not comparable |
| Agents & tools | – | 58.2 | not comparable |
| Maths | – | 65.1 | not comparable |
| Knowledge | 73.0 | 62.7 | Muse Wonder |
| Human preference | – | 68.0 | not comparable |
| Multimodal | – | 66.2 | not comparable |
| Long context | 65.5 | 65.3 | level |
| Composite | 78.2 | 70.3 | Muse Wonder |
Price, speed and latency
List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page; suite cost is what Artificial Analysis paid to run its whole Intelligence Index.
| Measure | Muse Wonder (max) | Qwen3.8 Max (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Blended price per 1M tokens | $8.00 | $3.00 |
| Input / output per 1M | $4.00 / $20.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 |
| Price per task: chat reply | $0.0076 | $0.0026 |
| Price per task: summarise a 30-page report | $0.060 | $0.028 |
| Price per task: code edit | $0.054 | $0.021 |
| Price per task: agentic coding session | $0.320 | $0.144 |
| Price per task: structured extraction | $0.012 | $0.0052 |
| Cost to run a full benchmark suite | $4.52 | $5.41 |
| Output speed | 85 tok/s | 36 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 60.8 s | 57.8 s |
| Time to a complete answer | 66.7 s | 71.6 s |
Every benchmark
| Metric | Muse Wonder (max) | Qwen3.8 Max (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 66.3 | 64.1 |
| Composite score | 78.2 | 70.3 |
| Knowledge score | 73.0 | 62.7 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 65.3 |
| Reasoning score | 87.8 | 71.9 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 58.2 |
| Coding score | – | 64.6 |
| Human preference score | – | 68.0 |
| Maths score | – | 65.1 |
| Multimodal score | – | 66.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $8.00 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 85 tok/s | 36 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 60.8 s | 57.8 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 27.0% |
| SciCode | – | 53.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 63.3% |
| ProofBench | – | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.4 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1483 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1504 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1524 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1672 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1314 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 2.3 |
| LiveBench | 81.2% | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 90.6% | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 80.7% | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 62.7% | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 96.5% | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 81.6% | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 82.9% | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 73.0% | 74.1% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.4 | 45.4 |
| AA-LCR | 80.7% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 82.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 25.5 | 12.0 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 50.1% | 43.1% |
| SciCode (AA) | 60.3% | 53.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.6% |
| IOI | – | 68.9% |
| LegalBench | – | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | – | 48.3 |
| CritPt | 28.3% | 20.0% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 63.5% | 58.4% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 51.3% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 40.3% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 45.0% |
| APEX-Agents (AA) | – | 42.4% |
| Code Migration | – | 24.0% |
| CyberBench | – | 28.6% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 60.1% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 50.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.6% |
| MedCode | – | 40.7% |
| MedScribe | – | 85.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 88.0% |
| MortgageTax | – | 64.0% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 23.9% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 67.1% |
| SAGE | – | 51.3% |
| SkillsBench | – | 42.0% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 66.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 34.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 1.4% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 65.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 12.8% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 64.7% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1497 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1470 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1474 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1492 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1492 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 52.0% | 38.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| AutomationBench | 68.1% | 56.2% |
| GDP.pdf | 30.6% | 22.8% |
| MLCR | – | 20.0% |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | – | 47.6% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 41.1% | 31.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 73.5% | 71.2% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1659 | 1617 |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (AA) | – | 43.2% |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA) | – | 11.9% |
| AA-3D | – | 948 |
Data as of 2026-10-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.8 Max: questions
- Is Muse Wonder better than Qwen3.8 Max?
- Muse Wonder (max) leads on quality: 66.3 vs 64.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Wonder (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Wonder or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Muse Wonder streams faster: 85 against 36 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Wonder accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.