BenchLeader

LFM2 24B A2B

LFM2 24B A2B is a Liquid AI open-weights model, released 25 Feb 2026. Its best configuration ranks #650 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 40.8 ±5.9, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 310 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (48) and lowest in long context (23). At $0.053 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Last measured 25 Feb 2026.stale: no new result in six months

Blended price
$0.053/M
$0.030 in · $0.120 out
Output speed
–
First answer
–
Context
33k
Full answer
–
Cost per run
–
Released
25 Feb 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index41
  2. Reasoning41
  3. Agents & tools34
  4. Knowledge35
  5. Instruction following48
  6. Long context23
  7. Composite36

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
354147

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarknot statedSource
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index47.4%#440Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index4.2%#522Artificial Analysis
CritPt0.0%#315Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarknot statedSource
Terminal-Bench Hard0.0%#362Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index11.1%#379Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSource
IFBench45.9%#198Artificial Analysis

Long context

Benchmarknot statedSource
AA-LCR0.0%#493Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarknot statedSource
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.26.0#550Artificial Analysis

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0000––
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0004––
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0004––
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0023––
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0001––

More from Liquid AI

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are LFM2 24B A2B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, LFM2 24B A2B scores 40.8 ±5.9 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (48) and weakest in long context (23). That rests on 6 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does LFM2 24B A2B rank?
LFM2 24B A2B is #650 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 310 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does LFM2 24B A2B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, LFM2 24B A2B costs $0.030 per 1M input tokens and $0.120 per 1M output tokens, $0.053 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was LFM2 24B A2B released?
Liquid AI released LFM2 24B A2B on 25 Feb 2026.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare with another model.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “LFM2 24B A2B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/lfm2-24b-a2b.