BenchLeader
NVIDIAOpen weightsReasoning modelCompare with another model

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Reasoning effort

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a NVIDIA open-weights reasoning model, released 18 Aug 2025. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #630 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 41.5 ±2.9, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 278 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in knowledge (43) and lowest in instruction following (32). At $0.070 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Output speed of 95 tokens per second puts it faster than most, with a first answer in 21.8 s. It has been measured at 3 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 18 Aug 2025.stale: no new result in six months

Blended price
$0.070/M
$0.040 in · $0.160 out
Output speed
95 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
22 s
Context
131k
Full answer
27 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
18 Aug 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index42
  2. Reasoning41
  3. Agents & tools35
  4. Knowledge43
  5. Instruction following32
  6. Long context35
  7. Composite38

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning40.6#654165 tok/s1.04 s$0.0001Agents & tools 34 · Composite 37 · Instruction following 32 · Knowledge 36 · Long context 36 · Reasoning 41
thinkingbest41.5#63095 tok/s22 s$0.0001Agents & tools 35 · Composite 38 · Instruction following 32 · Knowledge 43 · Long context 35 · Reasoning 41
not stated––––$0.0001Reasoning 45

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
384145
  • thinking
  • no reasoning

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSource
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index55.7%#40357.0%#397–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index4.6%#4894.9%#467–Artificial Analysis
Kagi LLM Benchmarkeffort not stated––47.4%#90Kagi LLM Benchmark
CritPt0.0%#3150.0%#315–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSource
Terminal-Bench Hard0.8%#3491.5%#338Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index23.4%#30421.9%#317Artificial Analysis

Knowledge

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSource
AA-Omniscience-57.3#443-41.5#328Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index9.8%#49711.8%#478Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index25.6%#23939.5%#161Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSource
IFBench27.1%#38027.6%#378Artificial Analysis

Long context

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSource
AA-LCR24.0%#41522.7%#420Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSource
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.26.8#5067.4#476Artificial Analysis

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.063$0.127$0.190$0.253Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.040 in · $0.160 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0001–24.9 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0006–28.1 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0005–37.6 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0030–1.1 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0001–23.9 s

More from NVIDIA

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (thinking effort) scores 41.5 ±2.9 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in knowledge (43) and weakest in instruction following (32). That rests on 6 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 rank?
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (thinking effort) is #630 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 278 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 costs $0.040 per 1M input tokens and $0.160 per 1M output tokens, $0.070 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 6 Oct 2026.
When was NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 released?
NVIDIA released NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on 18 Aug 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 3 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B v2: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/nemotron-nano-9b-v2.