AmazonNova 2.0 Omni (medium)
Best configuration ranks #323 of 610 on the BenchLeader Index at 48.5 ±8.1 (medium reasoning effort).
- Blended price
- $0.850/M
- $0.300 in · $2.50 out
- Output speed
- –
- First answer
- –
- Context
- 1M
- Overall index49
- Agents & tools38
- Knowledge36
- Instruction following65
- Multimodal46
- Long context56
- Composite46
Reasoning-effort configurations
The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Default” means the publisher did not say which setting was used.
| Effort | Index | Rank | Speed | First answer | Chat reply cost | Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | 47.8 | #346 | – | – | $0.0009 | Agents & tools 37 · Composite 43 · Instruction following 61 · Knowledge 40 · Long context 55 · Multimodal 44 |
| mediumbest | 48.5 | #323 | – | – | $0.0009 | Agents & tools 38 · Composite 46 · Instruction following 65 · Knowledge 36 · Long context 56 · Multimodal 46 |
| default | 41.9 | #475 | – | – | $0.0009 | Agents & tools 40 · Composite 39 · Instruction following 43 · Knowledge 34 · Long context 38 · Multimodal 34 |
Benchmark results
One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.
Reasoning
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index | 69.9%#287 | 76.0%#235 | 55.5%#385 | Artificial Analysis |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index | – | 7.0%#304 | 3.9%#474 | Artificial Analysis |
Agents & tools
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 3.8%#283 | 4.5%#270 | 6.8%#240 | Artificial Analysis |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index | 67.8%#158 | 80.4%#119 | 44.7%#207 | Artificial Analysis |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omniscience | -50.3#315 | -59.1#382 | -64.2#418 | Artificial Analysis |
Instruction following
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 61.8%#118 | 66.2%#97 | 41.1%#245 | Artificial Analysis |
Multimodal
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-Pro | 59.8%#179 | 61.9%#169 | 49.9%#206 | Artificial Analysis |
Long context
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 57.7%#227 | 59.7%#222 | 24.7%#341 | Artificial Analysis |
Composite
| Benchmark | low | medium | default | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.1#294 | 13.7#239 | 8.2#368 | Artificial Analysis |
What a task costs
Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.
| Workload | Tokens in / out | Cost | With caching | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply | 400 / 300 | $0.0009 | – | – |
| Summarise a 30-page report | 12,000 / 600 | $0.0051 | – | – |
| Code edit | 6,000 / 1,500 | $0.0056 | – | – |
| Agentic coding session | 60,000 / 4,000 | $0.028 | – | – |
| Structured extraction | 2,000 / 200 | $0.0011 | – | – |
See also
Data as of 9 Sept 2026. Compare these configurations.