BenchLeader

LiveBench Coding

LiveBench coding category.

Published by
LiveBench
Category
Coding
Index weight
Reference only
Models
52
Data as of
9 Sept 2026

LiveBench (livebench.ai), White et al. 2024.

52 of 52
#
1Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic86.4%70.2
2Claude Fable 5Anthropic86.0%65.8
3GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI83.9%65.5
4GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI83.6%60.7
5GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI82.9%56.5
6GPT-5.5OpenAI82.2%63.7
7Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic82.1%57.2
8Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic81.8%59.4
9Claude Opus 5Anthropic81.5%66.8
10Kimi K3Moonshot AIopen81.5%kimi-k366.5
11Muse Spark 1.3Meta81.1%63.9
12Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic80.7%57.3
13GPT-6 AstraOpenAI80.4%70.6
14GLM-5.2Zhipu AIopen79.7%glm-5.257.4
15Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic79.7%56.6
16Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic79.3%51.8
17GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu AIopen79.0%61.0
18GLM-5.3Zhipu AIopen79.0%glm-5.3
19Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle78.9%60.8
20Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIopen78.6%
21GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI78.3%58.0
22Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic78.2%61.3
23Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle78.2%60.4
24Qwen3.6 PlusAlibabaopen78.2%59.0
25Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle77.9%58.6
26GPT-5.4OpenAI77.5%61.3
27Muse Spark 1.2Meta77.5%61.3
28DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekopen77.2%081359.7
29Muse Spark 1.1Meta77.2%56.4
30Smaug FlashUnknown77.1%
31Grok 4.6xAI76.8%grok-4.663.6
32Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle76.5%60.7
33GPT-5.2OpenAI76.1%55.5
34Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle76.1%44.0
35Ox AlphaUnknown75.8%
36Qwen 3.8 27BAlibabaopen75.7%57.1
37Smaug MiniUnknown75.4%
38DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekopen75.0%073159.1
39Qwen3 7Alibaba74.2%58.9
40Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIopen74.0%56.2
41Qwen3 8Alibaba72.9%63.9
42Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibabaopen72.5%59.3
43Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle72.5%60.1
44Qwen3.6 27BAlibabaopen71.8%53.2
45GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI71.6%46.0
46GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI70.8%
47Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIAopen70.7%58.3
48Grok 4.3xAI69.9%grok-4.357.8
49Grok 4.5xAI68.6%grok-4.563.4
50Deepseek v4 Flash VisionDeepSeek68.2%57.4
51MiniMax-M3MiniMaxopen68.2%minimax-m356.9
52Grok Build 0.1xAI65.4%56.1