BenchLeader

Olmo 3.1 32B

Reasoning effort

Olmo 3.1 32B is an Ai2 open-weights model, released 12 Dec 2025. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #552 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 44.0 ±6.3, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 366 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (65) and lowest in long context (23). It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
–
Output speed
–
First answer
–
Context
66k
Full answer
–
Cost per run
–
Released
12 Dec 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index44
  2. Reasoning42
  3. Coding45
  4. Agents & tools34
  5. Maths47
  6. Knowledge42
  7. Instruction following65
  8. Human preference44
  9. Long context23
  10. Composite37

Versions

Ai2 has shipped 3 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Olmo 3.1 32Bthinkingthis page12 Dec 202544.0#552
Olmo 3 32Bthinking20 Nov 202542.8#585
Olmo 2 32B13 Mar 202540.0#665

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
thinkingbest44.0#552–––Agents & tools 34 · Coding 45 · Composite 37 · Human preference 44 · Instruction following 65 · Knowledge 42 · Long context 23 · Maths 47 · Reasoning 42
not stated42.5#592–––Agents & tools 34 · Coding 50 · Composite 37 · Human preference 49 · Instruction following 42 · Knowledge 38 · Long context 23 · Maths 46 · Reasoning 44

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
364451
  • thinking
  • not stated

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Metadata

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA Openness Indexnot in index88.9#188.9#1Artificial Analysis

Reasoning

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Hard Prompts1305#2571349#216Arena (LMArena)
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index59.1%#38153.9%#409Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index6.3%#4005.0%#454Artificial Analysis
CritPt0.0%#3150.0%#315Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Coding1341#2531382#215Arena (LMArena)

Agents & tools

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard0.0%#3620.0%#362Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index0.0%#39321.4%#323Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Maths1303#2261296#230Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA-Omniscience-43.4#341-52.4#408Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index13.8%#44912.1%#474Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index33.7%#19726.8%#231Artificial Analysis
Global-MMLU-Lite (AA)not in index71.5%#30–Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
IFBench66.0%#10039.2%#270Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1280#2591321#216Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1286#2681329#223Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1248#2651293#222Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1265#2711330#211Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1307#2491337#218Arena (LMArena)

Long context

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA-LCR0.0%#4930.0%#493Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.27.1#4926.5#523Artificial Analysis

More from Ai2

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Olmo 3.1 32B's benchmark scores?
As of 25 Oct 2026, Olmo 3.1 32B (thinking effort) scores 44.0 ±6.3 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (65) and weakest in long context (23). That rests on 10 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Olmo 3.1 32B rank?
Olmo 3.1 32B (thinking effort) is #552 of 785 ranked configurations on 25 Oct 2026. 366 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
When was Olmo 3.1 32B released?
Ai2 released Olmo 3.1 32B on 12 Dec 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Olmo 3.1 32B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 25 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/olmo-3-1-32b.