BenchLeader

Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) leaderboard

As of 9 Nov 2026, the top score on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) is 67.2% by Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI), ahead of Gemini 4 Carbon at 65.2%, across 250 model configurations with a published result (Artificial Analysis, result dated 23 Oct 2026). Real command-line tasks in a sandboxed terminal, version 4.0. Run by Artificial Analysis; the Terminal-Bench team's own run is the one in the index. Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) is shown for reference only and does not count toward the BenchLeader Index.

Key facts (as of 9 Nov 2026)

  • Kimi K3.1 Pro holds the top Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) score at 67.2% (Artificial Analysis, 23 Oct 2026).
  • Gemini 4 Carbon is second on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) at 65.2% (Artificial Analysis, 28 Oct 2026).
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): Real command-line tasks in a sandboxed terminal, version 4.0. Run by Artificial Analysis; the Terminal-Bench team's own run is the one in the index (Artificial Analysis).
  • 250 model configurations have a published Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) result on BenchLeader (BenchLeader, 9 Nov 2026).
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) does not feed the BenchLeader Index; it is shown for reference (BenchLeader methodology).

Real command-line tasks in a sandboxed terminal, version 4.0. Run by Artificial Analysis; the Terminal-Bench team's own run is the one in the index.

Published by
Artificial Analysis
Category
Coding
Index weight
Reference only
Models
250
Data as of
9 Nov 2026

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Data taken from the public leaderboard.

250 of 250
#
1Kimi K3.1 Pro67.2%61.2$5.27116k2026-10-23
2Gemini 4 Carbonhigh65.2%68.5$10.05161k2026-10-28
3Claude Sonnet 5.5max63.6%65.0$12.65382k2026-09-28
4Gemini 4 Carbonlow62.6%–$8.57139k2026-10-28
5NewClaude Fable 5.2xhigh61.6%68.7$20.81260k2026-11-09
6Gemini 4 Carbonmedium60.6%64.1$8.82143k2026-10-28
7NewClaude Fable 5.2max59.6%69.4$31.59377k2026-11-09
8Claude Opus 5.5max59.6%68.9$13.11253k2026-09-22
9NewClaude Fable 5.2high59.6%68.9$13.47158k2026-11-09
10GPT-6 Astraxhigh59.6%66.2$5.8643k2026-09-03
11Claude Opus 5.5xhigh59.6%65.5$8.78169k2026-09-22
12GPT-6 Astramax59.1%67.4$8.5076k2026-09-03
13Gemini 4 Argonhigh57.1%65.7$13.56165k2026-09-30
14Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh57.1%62.7$6.08192k2026-09-28
15Muse Wonder Fullmax57.1%62.2–153k2026-10-12
16Claude Opus 5.5high56.6%65.4$5.12100k2026-09-22
17GPT-6.1 Solmax56.1%67.0$1.82108k2026-09-29
18GPT-6.1 Terramax55.6%65.0$1.49101k2026-10-26
19NewClaude Fable 5.2medium55.0%66.3$5.2563k2026-11-09
20Claude Fable 5.1xhigh55.0%64.6$15.53158k2026-09-01
21NewClaude Fable 5.2low54.5%65.3$4.3453k2026-11-09
22GPT-6 Astrahigh54.0%66.5$4.0530k2026-09-03
23GPT-6.1 Solxhigh54.0%63.8$1.0357k2026-09-29
24Claude Opus 5.5medium52.5%61.5$4.0476k2026-09-22
25Claude Fable 5.1max52.0%66.9$18.77192k2026-09-01
26Claude Fable 5.1high52.0%63.3$11.49113k2026-09-01
27Muse Wondermax52.0%61.9$12.21167k2026-10-12
28GPT-6.1 Solhigh51.5%63.5$0.82844k2026-09-29
29GPT-6 Astramedium49.5%64.5$4.4330k2026-09-03
30Claude Opus 5max49.0%65.1$19.29205k2026-07-24
31GPT-6.1 Solmedium48.0%62.9$0.61432k2026-09-29
32Claude Opus 5xhigh46.5%60.1––2026-07-24
33GPT-6.1 Terraxhigh46.5%60.1$0.65747k2026-10-26
34Claude Opus 5high46.0%64.2––2026-07-24
35Claude Fable 5.1medium45.0%61.7$8.9884k2026-09-01
36GPT-6 Solmax43.9%62.9$4.0097k2026-09-22
37Claude Sonnet 5.5high43.9%58.0$2.1977k2026-09-28
38Claude Fable 5max42.4%65.3––2026-06-09
39GPT-6 Astralow41.9%62.2$2.2515k2026-09-03
40GPT-6.1 Terrahigh41.9%59.7$0.43830k2026-10-26
41GLM 5.3max41.9%58.9$8.06195k2026-08-18
42NewMuse Embermax40.9%–$0.266148k2026-11-09
43Claude Fable 5.1low40.4%58.7$7.2066k2026-09-01
44GPT-5.6 Solmax39.9%65.4––2026-07-09
45Qwen3.8 Maxmax38.9%58.9$18.68293k2026-09-02
46Muse Wonderhigh38.4%56.3$8.10116k2026-10-12
47Hy437.4%55.3$1.64123k2026-11-03
48GPT-5.6 Terramax35.4%60.5$6.39132k2026-07-09
49NewMuse Emberxhigh35.4%–$0.222132k2026-11-09
50MiMo-V2.6-Pro34.9%57.1$0.438184k2026-09-21
51GLM 5.3low34.9%47.4$6.40128k2026-08-18
52Claude Opus 5medium34.3%57.4––2026-07-24
53DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max33.8%58.9$0.880218k2026-10-17
54Muse Spark 1.3max33.3%61.7$5.58209k2026-09-02
55Step 5 Preview33.3%54.6$5.18260k2026-09-18
56Ling 3.1 Flash33.3%50.8––2026-10-01
57GLM 5.3 Flash32.8%56.8$0.889181k2026-08-26
58Claude Haiku 5.5max32.8%56.8$0.652347k2026-10-07
59GPT-6.1 Terramedium32.3%58.6$0.27619k2026-10-26
60Claude Opus 5.5low31.3%59.0$2.0838k2026-09-22

More coding benchmarks · All LLM benchmarks

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) leaderboard”, data as of 9 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/benchmarks/aa_terminalbench_40.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA): questions

What does Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) measure?
Real command-line tasks in a sandboxed terminal, version 4.0. Run by Artificial Analysis; the Terminal-Bench team's own run is the one in the index. Scores are reported in percent of tasks solved; higher is better.
What is the top score on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)?
As of 9 Nov 2026, the highest score on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) is 67.2% by Kimi K3.1 Pro (result dated 23 Oct 2026), ahead of Gemini 4 Carbon at 65.2%. Scores come from Artificial Analysis and are re-read daily.
Which AI model leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)?
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) with 67.2% as of 9 Nov 2026 (result dated 23 Oct 2026), ahead of Gemini 4 Carbon at 65.2%.
How many models have Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) results?
250 model configurations have a Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) result on BenchLeader, all taken from Artificial Analysis.
Who runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) and how often is it updated?
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) is published by Artificial Analysis. BenchLeader re-reads the published results once a day and records the date each result was published.
Does Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) count toward the BenchLeader Index?
No. Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) is shown for reference but left out of the composite index.