BenchLeader
MetaReasoning modelNewReleased 9 Nov 2026Compare with another model

Muse Ember

Reasoning effort
Price#37 of 252
$0.200per 1M tokens
Cheapest quarter
0.2× the median
Speed#21 of 218
189tokens/s
Top 10%
2.5× the median

No cheaper ranked model scores higher: it is on the price frontier.

As of 9 Nov 2026, Muse Ember by Meta is not yet ranked on the BenchLeader Index, which needs at least five independent results across two categories. API pricing: $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.500 per 1M output tokens ($0.200 blended at 3:1), list price on 9 Nov 2026. It streams about 190 tokens/s (OpenRouter). Released 9 Nov 2026.

Key facts (as of 9 Nov 2026)

  • Muse Ember API pricing: $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.500 per 1M output tokens ($0.200 blended at 3:1) (list price, 9 Nov 2026).
  • Muse Ember streams about 190 tokens/s (OpenRouter, 9 Nov 2026).
  • Muse Ember was released on 9 Nov 2026 (Meta).

In detail. Muse Ember is a Meta proprietary reasoning model, released 9 Nov 2026. It is not yet ranked: the index needs at least five independent results across two categories. At $0.200 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Output speed of 189 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first token in 1.8 s. It has been measured at 3 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 9 Nov 2026.

Blended price
$0.200/M
$0.100 in · $0.500 out
via Artificial Analysis
Output speed
189 tok/s
OpenRouter traffic, 7-day median; not yet measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
1.81 s
Context
1.0M
via OpenRouter
Full answer
–
Cost per task
$0.116
average task, AA Index
Tokens per task
72k
61% of it reasoning
Released
9 Nov 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Reasoning51
  2. Coding51
  3. Knowledge49

Get an email when Muse Ember gets its first benchmark results

And when Meta ships a new model, plus the weekly review on Mondays.

Choose providers and emails

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
xhighbest––189 tok/s1.81 s$0.0002Coding 51 · Knowledge 49 · Reasoning 51
max––189 tok/s1.81 s$0.0002Coding 57 · Knowledge 49 · Reasoning 52
not stated––189 tok/s1.81 s$0.0002

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

BenchmarkxhighmaxSource
HLE-Diamond (AA)23.6%#6525.1%#57Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2 hard subset (AA)38.5%#5739.0%#55Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkxhighmaxnot statedSource
Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in index–83.7%#23–Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index35.4%#4840.9%#42–Artificial Analysis
Design Arena Websitenot in indexeffort not stated––1330#8Design Arena
FrontierCode 2.0 (AA)22.0%#5727.2%#42–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

BenchmarkxhighmaxSource
Finance Agent v2.1not in index–63.8%#15Vals AI
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1.1not in index–25.0%#2Vals AI
Legal Research Benchnot in index–49.0%#10Vals AI
Tax Agent Benchnot in index–38.2%#14Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)not in index–39.4%#16Vals AI
AutomationBenchnot in index66.7%#2368.1%#17Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index22.4%#6522.8%#59Artificial Analysis
AA-Briefcase v1.1not in index1527#341521#38Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)not in index17.6%#4720.0%#44Artificial Analysis

Knowledge

Composite

BenchmarkxhighmaxSource
AA Intelligence Index v5.0not in index34.1#5036.0#43Artificial Analysis
Vals Indexnot in index–60.5#13Vals AI
Vals Finance Indexnot in index–60.9%#11Vals AI

API pricing: where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Meta189 tok/s1.81 s$0.100$0.5001.0M–

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0002–3.4 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0015–5.0 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0014–9.7 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0080–23.0 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0003–2.9 s

More from Meta

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

Why does Muse Ember have no BenchLeader Index score?
The index needs at least five independent results across at least two categories, and as of 9 Nov 2026 Muse Ember does not have them yet. Launch-post scores are never used, so it is ranked once independent publishers have measured it.
How much does Muse Ember cost per 1M tokens?
As of 9 Nov 2026, Muse Ember costs $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.500 per 1M output tokens, $0.200 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was Muse Ember released?
Meta released Muse Ember on 9 Nov 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 3 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 9 Nov 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Muse Ember: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 9 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/muse-ember.