LMCA leaderboard
As of 6 Nov 2026, the top score on LMCA is 68.3% by Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic), ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 68.2%, across 193 model configurations with a published result (Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, result dated 28 Sep 2026). A broad assessment scored 0 to 100 with a ceiling of 85 for the current version. LMCA is shown for reference only and does not count toward the BenchLeader Index.
Key facts (as of 6 Nov 2026)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 holds the top LMCA score at 68.3% (Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, 28 Sep 2026).
- Claude Opus 5.5 is second on LMCA at 68.2% (Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, 22 Sep 2026).
- LMCA: A capability assessment with a published score ceiling (Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub).
- 193 model configurations have a published LMCA result on BenchLeader (BenchLeader, 6 Nov 2026).
- LMCA does not feed the BenchLeader Index; it is shown for reference (BenchLeader methodology).
A capability assessment with a published score ceiling.
- Published by
- Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
- Category
- Reasoning
- Index weight
- Reference only
- Models
- 193
- Data as of
- 6 Nov 2026
CC BY 4.0 — Epoch AI, ‘AI Benchmarking Hub’, epoch.ai/benchmarks. Mirrored boards credit their original publishers.
What the test looks like
A broad assessment scored 0 to 100 with a ceiling of 85 for the current version.
How it is scored
Score, as published.
What to keep in mind
The ceiling means top scores compress; new.
- 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)68.3%
- 2Claude Opus 5.5 (max)68.2%
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)66.3%
- 4Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)66.2%
- 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)65.9%
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 (high)65.9%
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)65.7%
- 8Claude Fable 5.165.5%
- 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium)65.5%
- 10Claude Fable 5.1 (medium)65.3%
- 11Claude Fable 5.1 (high)65.1%
- 12Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)65.1%
- 13Claude Opus 5.5 (low)64.9%
- 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)64.5%
- 15Claude Opus 5 (xhigh)64.5%
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68.3% | 65.4 | 2026-09-28 | |
| 2 | 68.2% | 69.3 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 3 | 66.3% | 63.4 | 2026-09-28 | |
| 4 | 66.2% | 66.3 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 5 | 65.9% | 58.6 | 2026-09-28 | |
| 6 | 65.9% | 65.8 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 7 | 65.7% | 62.0 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 8 | 65.5% | 66.4 | 2026-09-01 | |
| 9 | 65.5% | 51.2 | 2026-09-28 | |
| 10 | 65.3% | 62.3 | 2026-09-01 | |
| 11 | 65.1% | 64.0 | 2026-09-01 | |
| 12 | 65.1% | 65.4 | 2026-09-01 | |
| 13 | 64.9% | 59.5 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 14 | 64.5% | 51.3 | 2026-09-28 | |
| 15 | 64.5% | 60.2 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 16 | 64.4% | 66.8 | 2026-09-03 | |
| 17 | 64.1% | 68.2 | 2026-09-03 | |
| 18 | 63.8% | 67.0 | 2026-09-03 | |
| 19 | 63.7% | 66.0 | 2026-09-30 | |
| 20 | 63.7% | 64.3 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 21 | 63.5% | 59.3 | 2026-09-01 | |
| 22 | 63.3% | 65.4 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 23 | 62.9% | 65.1 | 2026-09-03 | |
| 24 | 62.9% | 57.4 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 25 | 62.9% | – | 2026-09-30 | |
| 26 | 62.9% | – | 2026-09-30 | |
| 27 | 62.8% | 67.3 | 2026-09-29 | |
| 28 | 62.6% | 57.0 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 29 | 62.2% | 62.7 | 2026-09-03 | |
| 30 | 61.1% | 64.3 | 2026-06-09 | |
| 31 | 61.0% | – | 2026-06-09 | |
| 32 | 60.3% | 65.3 | 2026-06-09 | |
| 33 | 60.3% | – | 2026-06-09 | |
| 34 | 59.6% | – | 2026-06-09 | |
| 35 | 59.2% | – | 2026-07-09 | |
| 36 | 59.1% | 63.3 | 2026-09-22 | |
| 37 | 58.5% | 64.2 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 38 | 58.4% | 65.4 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 39 | 57.5% | 60.2 | 2026-05-28 | |
| 40 | 56.9% | 63.6 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 41 | 56.8% | 63.9 | 2026-10-12 | |
| 42 | 56.4% | 61.5 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 43 | 55.9% | 60.4 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 44 | 55.8% | 55.8 | 2026-02-05 | |
| 45 | 55.5% | – | 2026-08-14 | |
| 46 | 55.0% | 60.7 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 47 | 54.3% | 64.3 | 2026-04-23 | |
| 48 | 53.9% | – | 2026-04-23 | |
| 49 | 53.9% | 57.7 | 2026-09-02 | |
| 50 | 53.8% | 60.1 | 2026-02-19 | |
| 51 | 52.9% | 60.7 | 2026-09-02 | |
| 52 | 52.8% | – | 2026-02-19 | |
| 53 | 52.8% | 52.2 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 54 | 52.7% | 62.1 | 2026-07-16 | |
| 55 | 52.2% | 60.3 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 56 | 52.2% | 59.5 | 2026-04-16 | |
| 57 | 52.0% | 63.2 | 2026-03-05 | |
| 58 | 51.5% | 54.4 | 2026-09-02 | |
| 59 | 51.4% | 57.0 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 60 | 51.2% | – | 2026-02-19 |
More reasoning benchmarks · All LLM benchmarks
Related benchmarks
Top head-to-heads on LMCA
Cite as: BenchLeader, “LMCA leaderboard”, data as of 6 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/benchmarks/lmca.
LMCA: questions
- What does LMCA measure?
- A broad assessment scored 0 to 100 with a ceiling of 85 for the current version. Scores are reported in percent of tasks solved; higher is better.
- What is the top score on LMCA?
- As of 6 Nov 2026, the highest score on LMCA is 68.3% by Claude Sonnet 5.5 (result dated 28 Sep 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 68.2%. Scores come from Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub and are re-read daily.
- Which AI model leads LMCA?
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads LMCA with 68.3% as of 6 Nov 2026 (result dated 28 Sep 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 68.2%.
- How many models have LMCA results?
- 193 model configurations have a LMCA result on BenchLeader, all taken from Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub.
- Who runs LMCA and how often is it updated?
- LMCA is published by Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub. BenchLeader re-reads the published results once a day and records the date each result was published.
- Does LMCA count toward the BenchLeader Index?
- No. LMCA is shown for reference but left out of the composite index.