GPT-5.4 Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Together
Full profiles: GPT-5.4 Pro (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (Moonshot AI): every benchmark, price and rank.
Updated · Data from 4 sources
As of 9 Nov 2026, GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K3.1 Pro Together are neck and neck on quality (63.3 vs 60.5 on the BenchLeader Index, inside the ±4.3 margin). GPT-5.4 Pro leads in every category we measure both in.
Key facts (as of 9 Nov 2026)
- GPT-5.4 Pro scores 63.3 on the BenchLeader Index and Kimi K3.1 Pro Together scores 60.5 (BenchLeader, 9 Nov 2026).
- GPT-5.4 Pro costs $67.50 per 1M tokens blended (list price, 9 Nov 2026).
Which to pick for…
The pick's numbers come first. Category scores on the BenchLeader scale (50 is the average model, 15 points one standard deviation). High confidence means a lead of half a standard deviation or more; under one point is called either.
| Use case | Pick | Why | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | GPT-5.4 Pro | 73 vs 67 category score | Medium |
| Knowledge | GPT-5.4 Pro | 74 vs 68 category score | Medium |
| High volume on a budget | Neither flagship | A smaller model is usually the better fit: Cheapest good LLMs, Fastest LLMs | – |
Key differences
- GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) are neck and neck on quality (63.3 vs 60.5, within the ±4.3 margin).
- GPT-5.4 Pro is stronger in instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) is stronger in maths.
At a glance
| Spec | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Released | 4 Mar 2026 | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Context window (tokens) | 1,050,000 | – |
| Compared at | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Price in / out / cached input per 1M | $30.00 / $180.00 / – | – |
Category by category
Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 72.9 | 67.1 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Maths | – | 65.8 | not comparable |
| Knowledge | 74.0 | 67.6 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Instruction following | 63.1 | – | not comparable |
| Multimodal | 69.8 | – | not comparable |
On one chart
Each domain on the index's own scale, where 50 is an average model. Click a domain to see the benchmarks behind it. Pick up to 5 models from the list.
Dashed: that model has no result on the axis it crosses; the line only joins its neighbours.
Not drawn, no result for these models: Coding, Agents & tools, Long context, Human preference.
Where sources disagree
Across the 0 benchmarks both have, GPT-5.4 Pro leads 0, Kimi K3.1 Pro Together leads 0.
| Overall index | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.3 | 60.5 | neck and neck |
Each publisher runs its own tasks, harnesses and effort settings, so their overall verdicts can differ; BenchLeader reconciles them on one scale. † measured at another effort setting of the same model (the publisher did not test the one compared here).
Price, speed and latency
List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page. Cost, tokens and time per benchmark task are measured: Artificial Analysis’ averages over its whole Intelligence Index run.
| Measure | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Blended price per 1M tokens | $67.50 | – |
| Input / output per 1M | $30.00 / $180.00 | – / – |
| Price per task: chat reply | $0.066 | – |
| Price per task: summarize a 30-page report | $0.468 | – |
| Price per task: code edit | $0.450 | – |
| Price per task: agentic coding session | $2.52 | – |
| Price per task: structured extraction | $0.096 | – |
| Output speed | 6 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 8.9 s | – |
Each model is compared at its best-ranked reasoning-effort setting. GPT-5.4 Pro scores 63.3 and takes 9 s to its first answer token; GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) scores 59.9 in 9 s. Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) scores 60.5. Higher effort means more thinking before the answer: better scores, longer waits and more tokens billed. How reasoning effort changes scores and cost.
Every benchmark
21 benchmarks, grouped by category; each name links to the board and its leaders. † measured at another effort setting of the same model, shown for reference and not counted as a win.
| Metric | Publisher | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | BenchLeader | 63.3 | 60.5 |
| Instruction following score | BenchLeader | 63.1 | – |
| Knowledge score | BenchLeader | 74.0 | 67.6 |
| Multimodal score | BenchLeader | 69.8 | – |
| Reasoning score | BenchLeader | 72.9 | 67.1 |
| Maths score | BenchLeader | – | 65.8 |
| Blended price $/M | BenchLeader | $67.50 | – |
| Output speed | BenchLeader | 6 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | BenchLeader | 8.9 s | – |
| Context window | BenchLeader | 1,050,000 tokens | – |
| Reasoning | |||
| GPQA Diamond | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 94.6%† | 94.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | Scale AI / CAIS | 44.3% | – |
| SimpleBench | SimpleBench | 74.1% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | ARC Prize | 94.5%† | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | ARC Prize | 83.3%† | – |
| CritPt | Artificial Analysis | 30.0%† | – |
| Chess Puzzles | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 59.0%† | 45.0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | – | 42.0% |
| Coding | |||
| WeirdML | WeirdML | 57.4%† | – |
| Maths | |||
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 82.5%† | 78.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 58.5%† | 65.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | – | 100.0% |
| MathArena Apex | MathArena | 69.8%† | – |
| Knowledge | |||
| SimpleQA Verified | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 46.3%† | 62.2% |
| MultiNRC | Scale AI SEAL | 62.3% | – |
| Instruction following | |||
| MultiChallenge | Scale AI SEAL | 69.2% | – |
| TutorBench | Scale AI SEAL | 56.6% | – |
| Multimodal | |||
| VISTA | Scale AI SEAL | 53.9% | – |
| Composite | |||
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 160.2 | – |
| Safety & honesty | |||
| FORTRESS | Scale AI SEAL | 14.8% | – |
| MASK | Scale AI SEAL | 91.7% | – |
Data as of 2026-11-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
What changed
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max): first results.
- GPT-5.4 Pro: BenchLeader Index 63.6 → 63.1.
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 1 score revision.
- GPT-5.4 Pro: BenchLeader Index 62.1 → 63.6.
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 1 new result (MultiNRC).
- GPT-5.4 Pro: BenchLeader Index 64.0 → 62.1.
Related comparisons
- GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2
- GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-5.4 Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together vs Claude Fable 5.2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together vs GPT-6 Astra
- GPT-5.3-Codex vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Together
Rankings: Best LLM overall · Best LLM for agents · Best cheap LLMs
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro Together: questions
- Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Kimi K3.1 Pro Together?
- GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K3.1 Pro Together (max) are neck and neck on quality (63.3 vs 60.5, within the ±4.3 margin). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; the two are within the margin of error as of 9 Nov 2026, so check the category scores for your use.
- When was Kimi K3.1 Pro Together released?
- Kimi K3.1 Pro Together was released on 23 Oct 2026.