BenchLeader

Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B is an IBM open-weights reasoning model, released 25 Aug 2026. Its best configuration ranks #496 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 46.1 ±3.6, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 284 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in knowledge (54) and lowest in agents & tools (35). At $0.108 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Output speed of 97 tokens per second puts it faster than most, with a first answer in 21.2 s. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.108/M
$0.060 in · $0.250 out
Output speed
97 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
21 s
first token 0.88 s
Context
131k
Full answer
26 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
$0.024
one full Intelligence Index run
Released
25 Aug 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index46
  2. Reasoning43
  3. Coding49
  4. Agents & tools35
  5. Knowledge54
  6. Human preference44
  7. Long context47
  8. Composite42

Versions

IBM has shipped 6 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Granite 4.2 8Bthis page25 Aug 202646.1#496
Granite 4.1 8B29 Apr 202640.6#653
Granite 3.3 8Bno reasoning16 Apr 202539.2#695
Granite 3.1 8B–41.8#618
Granite 3.0 8B–––
Granite 3.2 8B–––

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 23 Oct 2026
434752

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Metadata

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA Openness Indexnot in index72.2#21Artificial Analysis

Reasoning

Coding

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Coding1370#223Arena (LMArena)
SciCode (AA)not in index31.5%#209Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index0.0%#152Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index18.4%#178Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
GDPval-AA v2.1not in index0.0%#124Artificial Analysis
τ³-Banking (AA)7.6%#160Artificial Analysis
AutomationBenchnot in index2.1%#182Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index0.6%#215Artificial Analysis
AA-Briefcase v1.1not in index310#56Artificial Analysis

Knowledge

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1283#254Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1290#261Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1199#292Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1272#267Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1307#251Arena (LMArena)

Long context

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA-LCR45.0%#338Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.211.1#364Artificial Analysis

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
CoreWeave62 tok/s0.40 s$0.100$0.150131kbf16
DeepInfra40 tok/s0.88 s$0.060$0.250131kbf16

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.069$0.138$0.206$0.275Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.060 in · $0.250 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0001–24.3 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0009–27.4 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0007–36.6 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0046–1.0 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0002–23.3 s

More from IBM

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Granite 4.2 8B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Granite 4.2 8B scores 46.1 ±3.6 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in knowledge (54) and weakest in agents & tools (35). That rests on 8 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Granite 4.2 8B rank?
Granite 4.2 8B is #496 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 284 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Granite 4.2 8B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.060 per 1M input tokens and $0.250 per 1M output tokens, $0.108 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 9 Sept 2026.
When was Granite 4.2 8B released?
IBM released Granite 4.2 8B on 25 Aug 2026.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare with another model.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Granite 4.2 8B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/granite-4-2-8b.