BenchLeader

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7 is a MiniMax open-weights reasoning model, released 18 Mar 2026. Its best configuration ranks #225 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 55.6 ±4.3, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 276 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (74) and lowest in agents & tools (47). At $0.525 per million tokens blended it is mid-priced. Output speed of 55 tokens per second puts it slower than most, with a first answer in 46.8 s. Last measured 23 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.525/M
$0.300 in · $1.20 out
Output speed
55 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
47 s
first token 1.16 s
Context
205k
Full answer
56 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
18 Mar 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index56
  2. Reasoning48
  3. Coding51
  4. Agents & tools47
  5. Maths54
  6. Knowledge55
  7. Instruction following74
  8. Human preference59
  9. Long context64
  10. Composite55

Versions

MiniMax has shipped 3 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
MiniMax M2.7this page18 Mar 202655.6#225
MiniMax M2.512 Feb 202653.6#280
MiniMax-M2.123 Dec 202553.8#268

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
455361

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Coding

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
SciCode50.1%#109SciCode
WeirdML37.0%#120WeirdML
Arena Coding1480#106Arena (LMArena)
Arena WebDev1398#92Arena (LMArena)
SciCode (AA)not in index50.1%#110Artificial Analysis
LiveCodeBench79.9%#69Vals AI
SWE-bench (Vals)not in index73.8%#49Vals AI
Code Migrationnot in index8.7%#62Vals AI
ProgramBenchnot in index0.0%#32Vals AI
Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in index11.9%#96Vals AI
ALE-Benchnot in index599.3#97Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index0.0%#152Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index55.4%#107Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
ProofBench3.0%#74Vals AI
AIME (Vals)91.0%#26Vals AI
Arena Maths1422#119Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA-Omniscience0.8#130Artificial Analysis
MMLU-Pro80.4%#84Vals AI
LegalBench84.0%#44Vals AI
CorpFin61.2%#56Vals AI
TaxEval66.6%#106Vals AI
CaseLaw v2not in index60.9%#23Vals AI
Excel Modeling Benchmarknot in index28.4%#64Vals AI
MedCodenot in index34.4%#77Vals AI
MedScribenot in index79.9%#58Vals AI
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index26.8%#212Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index64.4%#65Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
IFBench75.7%#27Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1409#125Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1415#130Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1364#154Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1425#117Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1432#119Arena (LMArena)

Long context

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA-LCR78.3%#112Artificial Analysis
MLCRnot in index5.6%#140Artificial Analysis

Composite

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Groq284 tok/s0.26 s$0.600$1.80197k–
MiniMax42 tok/s1.22 s$0.300$1.20205kfp8
MiniMax41 tok/s1.39 s$0.600$2.40205kfp8
AtlasCloud35 tok/s1.28 s$0.300$1.20197kfp8
NovitaAI34 tok/s1.42 s$0.270$1.08205kfp8
GMICloud31 tok/s1.23 s$0.210$0.840197kfp8

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.060 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0005$0.000452.3 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0043$0.002257.8 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0036$0.00251.2 min
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.023$0.0122.0 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0008$0.000550.5 s

More from MiniMax

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are MiniMax M2.7's benchmark scores?
As of 25 Oct 2026, MiniMax M2.7 scores 55.6 ±4.3 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (74) and weakest in agents & tools (47). That rests on 23 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does MiniMax M2.7 rank?
MiniMax M2.7 is #225 of 785 ranked configurations on 25 Oct 2026. 276 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does MiniMax M2.7 cost per 1M tokens?
As of 25 Oct 2026, MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.300 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, $0.525 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was MiniMax M2.7 released?
MiniMax released MiniMax M2.7 on 18 Mar 2026.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026. Compare with another model.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “MiniMax M2.7: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 25 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/minimax-m2-7.