Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is a NVIDIA open-weights reasoning model, released 4 Jun 2026. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #222 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 55.7 ±11.3, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 509 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (79) and lowest in agents & tools (38). At $1.13 per million tokens blended it is pricier than most ranked models. Output speed of 154 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first answer in 16.0 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 4 Jun 2026.
- Blended price
- $1.13/M
- $0.600 in · $2.70 out
- Output speed
- 154 tok/s
- measured by Artificial Analysis
- First answer
- 16 s
- first token 0.34 s
- Context
- 1M
- Full answer
- 19 s
- median, reasoning included
- Cost per run
- $0.470
- one full Intelligence Index run
- Released
- 4 Jun 2026
- Overall index56
- Reasoning46
- Agents & tools38
- Knowledge61
- Instruction following79
- Long context65
- Composite55
Reasoning-effort configurations
The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.
| Effort | Index | Rank | Speed | First answer | Chat reply cost | Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thinkingbest | 55.7 | #222 | 154 tok/s | 16 s | $0.0011 | Agents & tools 38 · Composite 55 · Instruction following 79 · Knowledge 61 · Long context 65 · Reasoning 46 |
| not stated | 55.5 | #229 | 91 tok/s | 0.34 s | $0.0011 | Agents & tools 40 · Coding 62 · Human preference 61 · Knowledge 58 · Maths 62 · Reasoning 60 |
How its index has moved
9 Sept 2026 to 25 Oct 2026- thinking
- not stated
The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.
Benchmark results
See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.
Metadata
| Benchmark | thinking | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Openness Indexnot in index | 83.3#12 | Artificial Analysis |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated | – | 1444#119 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| LiveBench 1.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 74.7%#61 | LiveBench | |
| GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index | 86.7%#107 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index | 28.4%#164 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals)not in indexeffort not stated | – | 86.1%#42 | Vals AI | |
| CritPt | 3.1%#176 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Coding
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena Codingeffort not stated | – | 1473#113 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| LiveBench 1.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 70.7%#61 | LiveBench | |
| SciCode (AA)not in index | 40.3%#171 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| LiveCodeBencheffort not stated | – | 86.0%#23 | Vals AI | |
| SWE-bench (Vals)not in indexeffort not stated | – | 69.0%#64 | Vals AI | |
| Code Migrationnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 4.9%#69 | Vals AI | |
| ProgramBenchnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 0.0%#32 | Vals AI | |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in indexeffort not stated | – | 7.6%#99 | Vals AI | |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index | 0.5%#139 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index | 53.9%#110 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)not in index | 10.5%#65 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Agents & tools
Maths
| Benchmark | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Mathematicsnot in index | 88.7%#42 | LiveBench | |
| Arena Maths | 1444#85 | Arena (LMArena) |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench 1.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 54.5%#63 | LiveBench | |
| AA-Omniscience | -0.4#139 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| MMLU-Proeffort not stated | – | 85.8%#53 | Vals AI | |
| LegalBencheffort not stated | – | 82.1%#74 | Vals AI | |
| CorpFineffort not stated | – | 65.5%#27 | Vals AI | |
| TaxEvaleffort not stated | – | 73.1%#51 | Vals AI | |
| Excel Modeling Benchmarknot in indexeffort not stated | – | 31.7%#62 | Vals AI | |
| MedCodenot in indexeffort not stated | – | 38.6%#68 | Vals AI | |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index | 22.6%#272 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index | 70.3%#41 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Instruction following
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Languagenot in indexeffort not stated | – | 70.8%#60 | LiveBench | |
| LiveBench Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 73.5%#16 | LiveBench | |
| IFBench | 81.4%#3 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| Arena Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 1405#130 | Arena (LMArena) |
Human preference
| Benchmark | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena Text | 1426#116 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Creative Writingnot in index | 1382#133 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Multi-turnnot in index | 1398#155 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Longer Queriesnot in index | 1433#118 | Arena (LMArena) |
Multimodal
| Benchmark | thinking | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-3Dnot in index | 573#22 | Artificial Analysis |
Long context
| Benchmark | thinking | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 79.3%#98 | Artificial Analysis | |
| MLCRnot in index | 5.6%#140 | Artificial Analysis |
Composite
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench 1.0not in indexeffort not stated | – | 67.4%#61 | LiveBench | |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 22.9#192 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| AA Cyber Indexnot in index | 13.1#19 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Where it wins
Benchmarks where this configuration ranks in the top five of every configuration measured.
Where to run it
Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.
| Provider | Speed | First token | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Quantisation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseten | 94 tok/s | 0.29 s | $0.600 | $2.40 | 203k | fp4 |
| Baseten | 91 tok/s | 0.33 s | $0.600 | $2.40 | 203k | fp4 |
| DeepInfra | 79 tok/s | 1.15 s | $0.500 | $2.20 | 262k | fp4 |
| Venice | 64 tok/s | 1.29 s | $0.625 | $3.13 | 256k | fp8 |
Price history
The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.
What a task costs
Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.120 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.
| Workload | Tokens in / out | Cost | With caching | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply | 400 / 300 | $0.0011 | $0.0009 | 17.9 s |
| Summarize a 30-page report | 12,000 / 600 | $0.0088 | $0.0045 | 19.9 s |
| Code edit | 6,000 / 1,500 | $0.0077 | $0.0055 | 25.7 s |
| Agentic coding session | 60,000 / 4,000 | $0.047 | $0.025 | 41.9 s |
| Structured extraction | 2,000 / 200 | $0.0017 | $0.0010 | 17.3 s |
More from NVIDIA
See also
Questions people ask
- What are Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B's benchmark scores?
- As of 25 Oct 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (thinking effort) scores 55.7 ±11.3 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (79) and weakest in agents & tools (38). That rests on 10 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
- How does Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B rank?
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (thinking effort) is #222 of 785 ranked configurations on 25 Oct 2026. 509 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
- How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B cost per 1M tokens?
- As of 25 Oct 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.600 per 1M input tokens and $2.70 per 1M output tokens, $1.13 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 17 Oct 2026.
- When was Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B released?
- NVIDIA released Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B on 4 Jun 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.
Data as of 25 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.
Cite as: BenchLeader, “Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 25 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.