BenchLeader

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Reasoning effort

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is a NVIDIA open-weights reasoning model, released 4 Jun 2026. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #222 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 55.7 ±11.3, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 509 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (79) and lowest in agents & tools (38). At $1.13 per million tokens blended it is pricier than most ranked models. Output speed of 154 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first answer in 16.0 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 4 Jun 2026.

Blended price
$1.13/M
$0.600 in · $2.70 out
Output speed
154 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
16 s
first token 0.34 s
Context
1M
Full answer
19 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
$0.470
one full Intelligence Index run
Released
4 Jun 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index56
  2. Reasoning46
  3. Agents & tools38
  4. Knowledge61
  5. Instruction following79
  6. Long context65
  7. Composite55

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
thinkingbest55.7#222154 tok/s16 s$0.0011Agents & tools 38 · Composite 55 · Instruction following 79 · Knowledge 61 · Long context 65 · Reasoning 46
not stated55.5#22991 tok/s0.34 s$0.0011Agents & tools 40 · Coding 62 · Human preference 61 · Knowledge 58 · Maths 62 · Reasoning 60

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 25 Oct 2026
365370
  • thinking
  • not stated

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Metadata

BenchmarkthinkingSourceTrend
AA Openness Indexnot in index83.3#12Artificial Analysis

Reasoning

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated–1444#119Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench 1.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–74.7%#61LiveBench
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index86.7%#107–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index28.4%#164–Artificial Analysis
GPQA Diamond (Vals)not in indexeffort not stated–86.1%#42Vals AI
CritPt3.1%#176–Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Codingeffort not stated–1473#113Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench 1.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–70.7%#61LiveBench
SciCode (AA)not in index40.3%#171–Artificial Analysis
LiveCodeBencheffort not stated–86.0%#23Vals AI
SWE-bench (Vals)not in indexeffort not stated–69.0%#64Vals AI
Code Migrationnot in indexeffort not stated–4.9%#69Vals AI
ProgramBenchnot in indexeffort not stated–0.0%#32Vals AI
Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in indexeffort not stated–7.6%#99Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index0.5%#139–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index53.9%#110–Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)not in index10.5%#65–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Agentic Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–38.7%#65LiveBench
Terminal-Bench Hard36.4%#71–Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index83.3%#110–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)effort not stated–50.9%#56Vals AI
GDPval-AA v2.1not in index25.6%#94–Artificial Analysis
τ³-Banking (AA)14.2%#123–Artificial Analysis
Analyst Agent (AA)not in index6.3%#49–Artificial Analysis
Finance Agent v2not in indexeffort not stated–37.7%#65Vals AI
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1not in indexeffort not stated–0.4%#58Vals AI
Legal Research Benchnot in indexeffort not stated–15.4%#65Vals AI
AutomationBenchnot in index3.0%#176–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index5.0%#166–Artificial Analysis
EnterpriseOps-Gymnot in index28.9%#43–Artificial Analysis
AA-Briefcase v1.1not in index876#51–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)not in index0.0%#72–Artificial Analysis
CWE-Bench (AA)27.5%#20–Artificial Analysis
DeepSec-Bench (AA)1.1%#22–Artificial Analysis
CyberGym end-to-end (AA)10.7%#14–Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Mathematicsnot in index88.7%#42LiveBench
Arena Maths1444#85Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 1.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–54.5%#63LiveBench
AA-Omniscience-0.4#139–Artificial Analysis
MMLU-Proeffort not stated–85.8%#53Vals AI
LegalBencheffort not stated–82.1%#74Vals AI
CorpFineffort not stated–65.5%#27Vals AI
TaxEvaleffort not stated–73.1%#51Vals AI
Excel Modeling Benchmarknot in indexeffort not stated–31.7%#62Vals AI
MedCodenot in indexeffort not stated–38.6%#68Vals AI
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index22.6%#272–Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index70.3%#41–Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Languagenot in indexeffort not stated–70.8%#60LiveBench
LiveBench Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated–73.5%#16LiveBench
IFBench81.4%#3–Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated–1405#130Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1426#116Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1382#133Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1398#155Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1433#118Arena (LMArena)

Multimodal

BenchmarkthinkingSourceTrend
AA-3Dnot in index573#22Artificial Analysis

Long context

BenchmarkthinkingSourceTrend
AA-LCR79.3%#98Artificial Analysis
MLCRnot in index5.6%#140Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 1.0not in indexeffort not stated–67.4%#61LiveBench
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.222.9#192–Artificial Analysis
AA Cyber Indexnot in index13.1#19–Artificial Analysis

Where it wins

Benchmarks where this configuration ranks in the top five of every configuration measured.

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Baseten94 tok/s0.29 s$0.600$2.40203kfp4
Baseten91 tok/s0.33 s$0.600$2.40203kfp4
DeepInfra79 tok/s1.15 s$0.500$2.20262kfp4
Venice64 tok/s1.29 s$0.625$3.13256kfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.743$1.49$2.23$2.97Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.600 in · $2.70 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.120 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0011$0.000917.9 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0088$0.004519.9 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0077$0.005525.7 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.047$0.02541.9 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0017$0.001017.3 s

More from NVIDIA

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B's benchmark scores?
As of 25 Oct 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (thinking effort) scores 55.7 ±11.3 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (79) and weakest in agents & tools (38). That rests on 10 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B rank?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (thinking effort) is #222 of 785 ranked configurations on 25 Oct 2026. 509 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 25 Oct 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.600 per 1M input tokens and $2.70 per 1M output tokens, $1.13 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 17 Oct 2026.
When was Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B released?
NVIDIA released Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B on 4 Jun 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 25 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.