BenchLeader

Qwen3.5-4B

Reasoning effort

Qwen3.5-4B is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 24 Feb 2026. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #481 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 46.6 ±5.2, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 335 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in long context (56) and lowest in knowledge (35). At $0.060 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Output speed of 17 tokens per second puts it in the slowest quarter, with a first answer in 119.8 s. It has been measured at 3 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 2 Mar 2026.stale: no new result in six months

Blended price
$0.060/M
$0.030 in · $0.150 out
Output speed
17 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
120 s
Context
66k
Full answer
150 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
24 Feb 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index47
  2. Reasoning41
  3. Agents & tools39
  4. Knowledge35
  5. Instruction following53
  6. Multimodal48
  7. Long context56
  8. Composite44

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning42.2#60411 tok/s1.12 s$0.0001Agents & tools 36 · Composite 42 · Instruction following 37 · Knowledge 28 · Long context 42 · Maths 48 · Multimodal 45 · Reasoning 41
thinkingbest46.6#48117 tok/s120 s$0.0001Agents & tools 39 · Composite 44 · Instruction following 53 · Knowledge 35 · Long context 56 · Multimodal 48 · Reasoning 41
not stated––––$0.0004Maths 31

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
374552
  • thinking
  • no reasoning

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index71.2%#28877.1%#225Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index8.0%#3559.9%#325Artificial Analysis
CritPt0.0%#3150.0%#315Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index21.4%#17025.8%#167Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard11.4%#21518.2%#171Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index87.7%#7692.1%#53Artificial Analysis
τ³-Banking (AA)4.3%#1936.8%#165Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarkno reasoningnot statedSourceTrend
OTIS Mock AIME55.8%#173–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AIME 2026effort not statedpossible contamination–89.7%#28MathArena
HMMT February 2026effort not statedpossible contamination–72.9%#28MathArena

Knowledge

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA-Omniscience-74.7#527-58.4#453Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index11.2%#48315.1%#420Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index3.2%#54313.4%#362Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
IFBench33.3%#33052.0%#164Artificial Analysis

Multimodal

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
MMMU-Pro62.1%#19965.4%#175Artificial Analysis

Long context

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA-LCR34.7%#37763.0%#268Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.210.8#37213.1#316Artificial Analysis

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.066 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0001$0.00012.3 min
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0005$0.00082.6 min
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0004$0.00063.5 min
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0024$0.00406.0 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0001$0.00012.2 min

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3.5-4B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3.5-4B (thinking effort) scores 46.6 ±5.2 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in long context (56) and weakest in knowledge (35). That rests on 8 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3.5-4B rank?
Qwen3.5-4B (thinking effort) is #481 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 335 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Qwen3.5-4B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3.5-4B costs $0.030 per 1M input tokens and $0.150 per 1M output tokens, $0.060 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was Qwen3.5-4B released?
Alibaba released Qwen3.5-4B on 24 Feb 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 3 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3.5-4B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-5-4b.