BenchLeader

Qwen3 30B A3B

Best configuration ranks #389 of 610 on the BenchLeader Index at 45.4 ±5.0. Last measured 2 Sept 2026. Released 29 Apr 2025.

Blended price
$0.215/M
$0.120 in · $0.500 out
Output speed
108 tok/s
First answer
2.26 s
first token 0.68 s
Context
131k
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index45
  2. Reasoning50
  3. Coding47
  4. Agents & tools48
  5. Maths52
  6. Knowledge33
  7. Instruction following36
  8. Human preference56
  9. Long context38
  10. Composite38

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Default” means the publisher did not say which setting was used.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning143 tok/s1.98 s$0.0002Maths 35 · Reasoning 38
thinking45.1#397148 tok/s21 s$0.0008Agents & tools 38 · Coding 35 · Composite 41 · Instruction following 52 · Knowledge 40 · Long context 57 · Maths 38 · Reasoning 51
defaultbest45.4#389108 tok/s2.26 s$0.0002Agents & tools 48 · Coding 47 · Composite 38 · Human preference 56 · Instruction following 36 · Knowledge 33 · Long context 38 · Maths 52 · Reasoning 50

Benchmark results

One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
GPQA Diamond50.4%#19970.1%#15761.7%#176Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LMArena Hard Prompts1407#145LMArena
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index70.7%#28265.9%#322Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index10.3%#2526.9%#306Artificial Analysis
Kagi LLM Benchmark54.9%#67Kagi LLM Benchmark

Coding

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
SciCode33.3%#137SciCode
WeirdML29.8%#127WeirdML
LMArena Coding1439#138LMArena
SciCode (AA)not in index33.0%#139Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
Terminal-Bench Hard5.3%#2636.8%#240Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index28.1%#26122.2%#300Artificial Analysis
BFCL Overall41.4%#33Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard

Maths

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
OTIS Mock AIME25.6%#19670.3%#12462.8%#142Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AIME 202688.3%#29MathArena
HMMT February 202678.8%#27MathArena
MathArena Apex0.5%#41MathArena

Knowledge

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
AA-Omniscience-51.5#329-66.0#425Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
IFBench50.7%#16833.1%#319Artificial Analysis

Human preference

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
LMArena Text1382#150LMArena

Long context

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
AA-LCR61.3%#21026.3%#335Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingdefaultSource
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in index139.7#100137.4#109Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AA Intelligence Index9.8#3197.5#390Artificial Analysis

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
DeepInfra112 tok/s0.96 s$0.120$0.50041kfp8
Alibaba Cloud Int.89 tok/s0.41 s$0.130$0.520131k

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.010 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0002$0.00025.0 s
Summarise a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0017$0.00087.8 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0015$0.001016.2 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0092$0.004339.4 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0003$0.00024.1 s

See also

Data as of 9 Sept 2026. Compare these configurations.