BenchLeader

Qwen3 30B A3B

Reasoning effort

Qwen3 30B A3B is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 29 Apr 2025. Its best configuration ranks #432 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 48.3 ±3.7, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 296 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in maths (52) and lowest in coding (43). At $0.215 per million tokens blended it is cheaper than most ranked models. Output speed of 118 tokens per second puts it faster than most, with a first token in 0.5 s. It has been superseded by Qwen3 30B A3B 2507, which is the version to compare against today. It has been measured at 3 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.215/M
$0.120 in · $0.500 out
Output speed
118 tok/s
OpenRouter traffic, 7-day median; not yet measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
0.50 s
Context
41k
Full answer
–
Cost per run
–
Released
29 Apr 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index48
  2. Reasoning47
  3. Coding43
  4. Maths52
  5. Human preference49

Versions

Alibaba has shipped 2 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Qwen3 30B A3B 250730 Jul 202545.6#509
Qwen3 30B A3Bthis page29 Apr 202548.3#432

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning38.7#705145 tok/s0.59 s$0.0002Agents & tools 40 · Composite 37 · Instruction following 36 · Knowledge 32 · Long context 23 · Maths 35 · Reasoning 40
thinking41.1#641130 tok/s16 s$0.0002Agents & tools 36 · Composite 38 · Instruction following 44 · Knowledge 38 · Long context 23 · Reasoning 41
not statedbest48.3#432118 tok/s0.50 s$0.0002Coding 43 · Human preference 49 · Maths 52 · Reasoning 47

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 23 Oct 2026
354453
  • not stated
  • thinking
  • no reasoning

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
GPQA Diamond50.4%#214–61.7%#190Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated––1344#220Arena (LMArena)
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index51.5%#42161.6%#364–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index4.6%#4886.2%#405–Artificial Analysis
CritPt0.0%#3150.0%#315–Artificial Analysis
LMCAnot in indexeffort not stated––15.8%#171Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DTBenchnot in indexeffort not stated––60.3%#185Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub

Coding

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
WeirdML29.8%#133WeirdML
Arena Coding1385#211Arena (LMArena)

Agents & tools

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard6.8%#2492.3%#320Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index22.2%#31426.0%#287Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarkno reasoningnot statedSourceTrend
OTIS Mock AIME25.6%#21562.8%#158Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Mathseffort not stated–1351#199Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA-Omniscience-66.0#502-51.5#402Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index12.0%#47516.2%#397Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index11.4%#38919.3%#288Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
IFBench31.9%#34641.5%#246–Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated––1309#229Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1327#226Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1283#235Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1319#227Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1338#217Arena (LMArena)
Lech Mazur Creative Writingnot in index75.3%#25Lech Mazur

Long context

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA-LCR0.0%#4930.0%#493Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in indexeffort not stated––136.1#128Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.26.6#5187.6#463–Artificial Analysis

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
DeepInfra141 tok/s0.41 s$0.120$0.50041kfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.220$0.440$0.660$0.880Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.120 in · $0.500 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0002–3.0 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0017–5.6 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0015–13.2 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.0092–34.4 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0003–2.2 s

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3 30B A3B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B scores 48.3 ±3.7 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in maths (52) and weakest in coding (43). That rests on 7 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3 30B A3B rank?
Qwen3 30B A3B is #432 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 296 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Qwen3 30B A3B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.120 per 1M input tokens and $0.500 per 1M output tokens, $0.215 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 19 Sept 2026.
When was Qwen3 30B A3B released?
Alibaba released Qwen3 30B A3B on 29 Apr 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 3 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3 30B A3B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-30b-a3b.