Qwen3 30B A3B 2507
4 cheaper ranked models score higher: GPT-5 nano (55.9, $0.138), Qwen3.5 Flash (51.9, $0.094), Ling 3.0 Flash (51.8, $0.115) and 1 more.
As of 2 Nov 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 by Alibaba scores 48.1 on the BenchLeader Index (585 ranked configurations), with its best results in coding (56) and weakest in instruction following (37). API pricing: $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.300 per 1M output tokens ($0.150 blended at 3:1), list price on 2 Nov 2026. It streams about 200 tokens/s (Artificial Analysis). Released 30 Jul 2025.
Key facts (as of 2 Nov 2026)
- Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 API pricing: $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.300 per 1M output tokens ($0.150 blended at 3:1) (list price, 2 Nov 2026).
- Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 streams about 200 tokens/s (Artificial Analysis, 2 Nov 2026).
- Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 was released on 30 Jul 2025 (Alibaba).
In detail. Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 30 Jul 2025. Its best configuration ranks #376 of 585 on the BenchLeader Index at 48.1 ±5.0, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 258 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in coding (56) and lowest in instruction following (37). At $0.150 per million tokens blended it is among the cheapest fifth of ranked models. Output speed of 201 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first answer in 0.9 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 28 Oct 2026.
- Blended price
- $0.150/M
- $0.100 in · $0.300 out
- via Artificial Analysis
- Output speed
- 201 tok/s
- measured by Artificial Analysis
- First answer
- 0.93 s
- first token 0.30 s
- Context
- 262k
- via Artificial Analysis
- Full answer
- 3.42 s
- median, reasoning included
- Cost per task
- –
- Tokens per task
- –
- Released
- 30 Jul 2025
- Overall index48
- Reasoning46
- Coding56
- Agents & tools48
- Maths53
- Instruction following37
- Human preference55
- Long context37
Versions
Alibaba has shipped 2 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.
| Model | Released | Index | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 30B A3B 2507this page | 30 Jul 2025 | 48.1 | #376 |
| Qwen3 30B A3B | 29 Apr 2025 | 48.2 | #375 |
Reasoning-effort configurations
The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.
| Effort | Index | Rank | Speed | First answer | Chat reply cost | Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thinking | 44.8 | #445 | 201 tok/s | 0.93 s | $0.0001 | Agents & tools 35 · Coding 30 · Instruction following 52 · Long context 55 · Maths 38 · Reasoning 51 |
| not statedbest | 48.1 | #376 | 201 tok/s | 0.93 s | $0.0001 | Agents & tools 48 · Coding 56 · Human preference 55 · Instruction following 37 · Long context 37 · Maths 53 · Reasoning 46 |
How its index has moved
8 Sep 2026 to 29 Oct 2026- not stated
- thinking
The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.
Benchmark results
See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.
Reasoning
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.1%#173 | 55.6%#205 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated | – | 1407#170 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index | 70.7%#297 | 65.9%#341 | Artificial Analysis | |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index | 10.3%#329 | 6.9%#388 | Artificial Analysis | |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9%#67 | – | Kagi LLM Benchmark | |
| CritPtnot in index | 0.3%#282 | 0.0%#328 | Artificial Analysis | |
| LMCAnot in index | 19.5%#160 | 22.4%#155 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| DTBenchnot in index | 69.3%#158 | 67.2%#167 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub |
Coding
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 33.0%#204 | – | SciCode | |
| Arena Codingeffort not stated | – | 1438#161 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| SciCode (AA)not in index | 33.0%#212 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index | 0.0%#167 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index | 1.5%#224 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| LiveCodeBench (AA)not in index | 70.7%#62 | 51.5%#134 | Artificial Analysis |
Agents & tools
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 5.3%#279 | 6.1%#268 | Artificial Analysis | |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index | 28.1%#271 | 10.2%#388 | Artificial Analysis | |
| BFCL Overalleffort not stated | – | 41.4%#33 | Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | 5.4%#181 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| AutomationBenchnot in index | 0.8%#215 | – | Artificial Analysis | |
| GDP.pdf (AA)not in index | 0.4%#231 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Maths
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 70.3%#141 | 62.2%#161 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| AIME 2026 | 88.3%#29 | – | MathArena | |
| HMMT February 2026 | 78.8%#27 | – | MathArena | |
| MathArena Apex | 0.5%#41 | – | MathArena | |
| Arena Mathseffort not stated | – | 1378#177 | Arena (LMArena) |
Instruction following
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 50.7%#172 | 33.1%#336 | Artificial Analysis | |
| Arena Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated | – | 1366#180 | Arena (LMArena) |
Human preference
| Benchmark | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena Text | 1382#176 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Creative Writingnot in index | 1318#199 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Multi-turnnot in index | 1379#176 | Arena (LMArena) | |
| Arena Longer Queriesnot in index | 1381#178 | Arena (LMArena) |
Long context
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR v1.1 | 61.3%#283 | 26.3%#419 | Artificial Analysis | |
| MLCRnot in index | 2.2%#163 | – | Artificial Analysis |
Composite
| Benchmark | thinking | not stated | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in index | 139.6#117 | 137.3#128 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2not in index | 9.8#400 | 7.5#480 | Artificial Analysis | |
| AA Progress Index v1not in index | 214.2#368 | 198.5#420 | Artificial Analysis |
API pricing: where to run it
Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.
| Provider | Speed | First token | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Quantisation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nebius Token Factory | 161 tok/s | 0.23 s | $0.100 | $0.300 | 262k | fp8 |
| DekaLLM | 72 tok/s | 0.46 s | $0.090 | $0.300 | 262k | – |
| SiliconFlow | 28 tok/s | 1.01 s | $0.090 | $0.300 | 262k | fp8 |
Price history
The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.
What a task costs
Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.100 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.
| Workload | Tokens in / out | Cost | With caching | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply | 400 / 300 | $0.0001 | $0.0001 | 2.4 s |
| Summarize a 30-page report | 12,000 / 600 | $0.0014 | $0.0014 | 3.9 s |
| Code edit | 6,000 / 1,500 | $0.0011 | $0.0011 | 8.4 s |
| Agentic coding session | 60,000 / 4,000 | $0.0072 | $0.0072 | 20.9 s |
| Structured extraction | 2,000 / 200 | $0.0003 | $0.0003 | 1.9 s |
See also
Embed or cite
Show where Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 ranks on a model card or README. The badge redraws itself with every daily update, carries the data date and links back to this page. To see ranks like this on OpenRouter and Hugging Face model pages, get the Chrome extension.
[](https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507)Cite this
The ranking changes daily, so a reference carries the data date. APA style:
BenchLeader. (2026, November 2). Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 on the BenchLeader Index (method v1.4) [Data set]. Retrieved November 2, 2026, from https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507
BibTeX:
@misc{benchleader_qwen3_30b_a3b_2507_20261102,
author = {{BenchLeader}},
title = {{Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 on the BenchLeader Index (method v1.4)}},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
howpublished = {\url{https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507}},
note = {Data as of 2026-11-02}
}Every badge style, the embeddable top-10 widget and how to cite the Index
Questions people ask
- What are Qwen3 30B A3B 2507's benchmark scores?
- As of 2 Nov 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 scores 48.1 ±5.0 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in coding (56) and weakest in instruction following (37). That rests on independent benchmark results only, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
- How does Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 rank?
- Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 is #376 of 585 ranked configurations on 2 Nov 2026. 258 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 69.2.
- How much does Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 cost per 1M tokens?
- As of 2 Nov 2026, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 costs $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $0.300 per 1M output tokens, $0.150 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 21 Oct 2026.
- When was Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 released?
- Alibaba released Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 on 30 Jul 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.
Data as of 2 Nov 2026. Compare these configurations.
Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3 30B A3B 2507: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 2 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507.