BenchLeader

Deepseek v4 Flash Vision

Reasoning effort

Deepseek v4 Flash Vision is a DeepSeek proprietary reasoning model, released 21 Aug 2026. Its best configuration (max reasoning effort) ranks #158 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 58.2 ±4.9, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 258 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in agents & tools (70) and lowest in knowledge (54). At $0.660 per million tokens blended it is mid-priced. Output speed of 191 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first answer in 12.0 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 21 Aug 2026.

Blended price
$0.660/M
$0.440 in · $1.32 out
Output speed
191 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
12 s
first token 1.07 s
Context
1.0M
Full answer
15 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
$1.04
one full Intelligence Index run
Released
21 Aug 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index58
  2. Reasoning59
  3. Agents & tools70
  4. Knowledge54
  5. Multimodal58
  6. Long context66
  7. Composite69

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
maxbest58.2#158191 tok/s12 s$0.0006Agents & tools 70 · Composite 69 · Knowledge 54 · Long context 66 · Multimodal 58 · Reasoning 59
not stated––90 tok/s1.07 s$0.0002Composite 46

How its index has moved

19 Sept 2026 to 23 Oct 2026
535965

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–85.4%#31LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–85.4%#37LiveBench
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index91.3%#48–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index34.5%#127–Artificial Analysis
CritPt10.9%#115–Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–37.6%#51LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–68.2%#64LiveBench
SciCode (AA)not in index49.6%#114–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index12.1%#84–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index74.2%#66–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Long Agenticnot in indexeffort not stated–39.0%#26LiveBench
LiveBench Browsernot in indexeffort not stated–64.0%#26LiveBench
LiveBench Agentic Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–65.1%#6LiveBench
GDPval-AA v2.1not in index52.3%#32–Artificial Analysis
τ³-Banking (AA)41.0%#27–Artificial Analysis
AutomationBenchnot in index47.5%#87–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index12.0%#116–Artificial Analysis
EnterpriseOps-Gymnot in index47.1%#11–Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Mathematicsnot in index87.8%#45LiveBench

Knowledge

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–79.5%#12LiveBench
LiveBench Researchnot in indexeffort not stated–69.2%#35LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–79.5%#13LiveBench
AA-Omniscience-17.6#233–Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index38.6%#133–Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index8.5%#457–Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Languagenot in index80.4%#29LiveBench
LiveBench Instruction Followingnot in index71.0%#26LiveBench

Multimodal

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Designnot in indexeffort not stated–70.7%#38LiveBench
MMMU-Pro74.8%#108–Artificial Analysis

Long context

BenchmarkmaxSourceTrend
AA-LCR81.3%#56Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0effort not stated–63.6%#34LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0not in indexeffort not stated–76.8%#28LiveBench
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.234.8#90–Artificial Analysis

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
GMICloud95 tok/s1.74 s$0.440$1.321.0Mfp8
DeepInfra68 tok/s1.01 s$0.216$0.6471.0Mfp8
SiliconFlow58 tok/s1.30 s$0.440$1.321.0Mfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.363$0.726$1.09$1.45Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.440 in · $1.32 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.003 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0006$0.000413.6 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0061$0.002115.1 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0046$0.002719.8 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.032$0.01233.0 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0011$0.000513.0 s

More from DeepSeek

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Deepseek v4 Flash Vision's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Deepseek v4 Flash Vision (max effort) scores 58.2 ±4.9 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in agents & tools (70) and weakest in knowledge (54). That rests on 6 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Deepseek v4 Flash Vision rank?
Deepseek v4 Flash Vision (max effort) is #158 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 258 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Deepseek v4 Flash Vision cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Deepseek v4 Flash Vision costs $0.440 per 1M input tokens and $1.32 per 1M output tokens, $0.660 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 6 Oct 2026.
When was Deepseek v4 Flash Vision released?
DeepSeek released Deepseek v4 Flash Vision on 21 Aug 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Deepseek v4 Flash Vision: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/deepseek-v4-flash-vision.