BenchLeader

Qwen3-Next 80B A3B

Reasoning effort

Qwen3-Next 80B A3B is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 11 Sept 2025. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #401 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 49.3 ±4.3, in the lower half. The ± is the point: 309 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in maths (57) and lowest in agents & tools (37). At $0.350 per million tokens blended it is cheaper than most ranked models. Output speed of 109 tokens per second puts it faster than most, with a first answer in 0.8 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.350/M
$0.100 in · $1.10 out
Output speed
109 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
0.78 s
first token 0.78 s
Context
131k
Full answer
5.39 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
11 Sept 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index49
  2. Reasoning49
  3. Coding55
  4. Agents & tools37
  5. Maths57
  6. Knowledge38
  7. Instruction following55
  8. Human preference54
  9. Long context57
  10. Composite42

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
thinkingbest49.3#401109 tok/s0.78 s$0.0004Agents & tools 37 · Coding 55 · Composite 42 · Human preference 54 · Instruction following 55 · Knowledge 38 · Long context 57 · Maths 57 · Reasoning 49
not stated48.3#431109 tok/s0.78 s$0.0004Agents & tools 40 · Coding 57 · Composite 40 · Human preference 57 · Instruction following 42 · Knowledge 35 · Long context 53 · Maths 59 · Reasoning 48

How its index has moved

9 Sept 2026 to 21 Oct 2026
445056
  • thinking
  • not stated

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Hard Prompts1385#1811419#148Arena (LMArena)
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index75.9%#24473.8%#263Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index12.6%#2787.7%#358Artificial Analysis
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.7%#3654.4%#69Kagi LLM Benchmark
GPQA Diamond (HELM)not in index63.0%#23–HELM Capabilities
CritPt0.0%#3150.0%#315Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Coding1421#1801444#150Arena (LMArena)
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index6.7%#199–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard9.8%#2287.6%#241Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index41.5%#21921.6%#319Artificial Analysis
GDPval-AA v2.1not in index0.0%#124–Artificial Analysis
τ³-Banking (AA)6.2%#169–Artificial Analysis

Maths

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Omni-MATH (HELM)46.7%#22–HELM Capabilities
Arena Maths1392#1591414#129Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA-Omniscience-51.4#400-59.5#463Artificial Analysis
MMLU-Pro (HELM)not in index78.6%#23–HELM Capabilities
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index19.0%#32117.3%#369Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index13.0%#3657.3%#486Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
IFBench60.7%#12539.7%#264Artificial Analysis
IFEval (HELM)81.0%#44–HELM Capabilities
WildBench (HELM)80.7%#29–HELM Capabilities
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1358#1831376#166Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1369#1831399#151Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1326#1901313#202Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1349#1951401#152Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1370#1871389#171Arena (LMArena)

Long context

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Fiction.LiveBench 120keffort not stated–62.5%#13Fiction.live
AA-LCR63.7%#26452.7%#314Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.211.2#3599.6#392Artificial Analysis
HELM Capabilities meannot in index70.0%#23–HELM Capabilities

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Parasail118 tok/s0.45 s$0.100$1.10262kfp8
DeepInfra114 tok/s0.56 s$0.090$1.10262kfp8
DeepInfra114 tok/s0.47 s$0.135$1.65262kfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.550$1.10$1.65$2.20Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.100 in · $1.10 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0004–3.5 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0019–6.3 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0023–14.6 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.010–37.6 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0004–2.6 s

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3-Next 80B A3B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3-Next 80B A3B (thinking effort) scores 49.3 ±4.3 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in maths (57) and weakest in agents & tools (37). That rests on 15 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3-Next 80B A3B rank?
Qwen3-Next 80B A3B (thinking effort) is #401 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 309 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Qwen3-Next 80B A3B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3-Next 80B A3B costs $0.100 per 1M input tokens and $1.10 per 1M output tokens, $0.350 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 24 Oct 2026.
When was Qwen3-Next 80B A3B released?
Alibaba released Qwen3-Next 80B A3B on 11 Sept 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3-Next 80B A3B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-next-80b-a3b.