BenchLeader

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Reasoning effort

As of 29 Oct 2026, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Alibaba scores 51.9 on the BenchLeader Index (581 ranked configurations), with its best results in long context (60) and weakest in agents & tools (39). It costs $0.385 per 1M tokens blended ($0.210 in / $0.840 out), and streams about 110 tokens/s (Artificial Analysis). Released 22 Jul 2025; 15 independent results so far.

Key facts (as of 29 Oct 2026)

  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.385 per 1M tokens blended ($0.210 in / $0.840 out) (list price, 29 Oct 2026).
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 streams about 110 tokens/s (Artificial Analysis, 29 Oct 2026).
  • Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 was released on 22 Jul 2025 (Alibaba).

In detail. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 22 Jul 2025. Its best configuration (thinking reasoning effort) ranks #286 of 581 on the BenchLeader Index at 51.9 ±4.0, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 266 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in long context (60) and lowest in agents & tools (39). At $0.368 per million tokens blended it is cheaper than most ranked models. Output speed of 107 tokens per second puts it faster than most, with a first answer in 19.4 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.368/M
$0.210 in · $0.840 out
Output speed
107 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
19 s
first token 1.23 s
Context
262k
Full answer
24 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
22 Jul 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index52
  2. Reasoning58
  3. Coding48
  4. Agents & tools39
  5. Maths58
  6. Knowledge47
  7. Instruction following53
  8. Human preference57
  9. Long context60

Versions

Alibaba has shipped 2 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507thinkingthis page22 Jul 202551.9#286
Qwen3 235B A22B28 Apr 202550.0#330

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
thinkingbest51.9#286107 tok/s19 s$0.0003Agents & tools 39 · Coding 48 · Human preference 57 · Instruction following 53 · Knowledge 47 · Long context 60 · Maths 58 · Reasoning 58
not stated50.9#31347 tok/s1.23 s$0.0003Agents & tools 57 · Coding 51 · Human preference 60 · Instruction following 54 · Knowledge 38 · Long context 41 · Maths 69 · Reasoning 38

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 29 Oct 2026
455259
  • thinking
  • not stated

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
GPQA Diamond80.0%#127–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Hard Prompts1418#1581447#114Arena (LMArena)
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index79.0%#20675.3%#251Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index15.9%#25811.1%#309Artificial Analysis
GPQA Diamond (HELM)not in indexeffort not stated–72.6%#7HELM Capabilities
ARC-AGI-1effort not stated–11.0%#235ARC Prize
ARC-AGI-2effort not stated–1.3%#219ARC Prize
CritPtnot in index0.0%#3280.0%#328Artificial Analysis
Mystery Game Puzzlesnot in index9.0%#116–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LMCAnot in index29.3%#14023.5%#154Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DTBenchnot in index80.3%#13178.4%#140Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
ForecastBenchnot in index62.2%#59–ForecastBench

Coding

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
SciCode41.4%#163–SciCode
WeirdML41.0%#9838.7%#111WeirdML
Arena Coding1442#1571472#117Arena (LMArena)
SciCode (AA)not in index41.4%#175–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index0.0%#163–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index12.0%#192–Artificial Analysis
LiveCodeBench (AA)not in index78.8%#3252.4%#131Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard13.6%#20315.2%#195Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index53.2%#19233.3%#246Artificial Analysis
BFCL Overalleffort not stated–52.1%#21Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard
τ³-Banking (AA)7.8%#161–Artificial Analysis
Vending-Bench 2not in index-11.3#67–Andon Labs
AutomationBenchnot in index2.1%#192–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index4.8%#179–Artificial Analysis
BrowseCompnot in index0.5%#29–OpenAI
FACTS Searchnot in indexeffort not stated–53.4%#22Google

Maths

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%#88–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Omni-MATH (HELM)effort not stated–71.8%#3HELM Capabilities
Arena Maths1396#1561417#127Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
SimpleQA Verified40.4%#49–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
PRBench Financeeffort not stated–39.1%#30Scale AI SEAL
PRBench Legaleffort not stated–38.3%#36Scale AI SEAL
MultiNRCpossible contamination27.1%#28–Scale AI SEAL
MMLU-Pro (HELM)not in indexeffort not stated–84.4%#9HELM Capabilities

Instruction following

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
IFBench51.2%#16946.0%#199Artificial Analysis
IFEval (HELM)effort not stated–83.5%#31HELM Capabilities
WildBench (HELM)effort not stated–86.6%#1HELM Capabilities
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1385#1551414#120Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1400#1521422#123Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1370#1501378#138Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1393#1661436#107Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1402#1601433#119Arena (LMArena)
Lech Mazur Creative Writingnot in index82.4%#11–Lech Mazur

Long context

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Fiction.LiveBench 120k68.8%#8–Fiction.live
AA-LCR v1.172.0%#19933.9%#391Artificial Analysis
MLCRnot in index8.9%#126–Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in index143.8#93138.8#120Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2not in index12.7#33512#349Artificial Analysis
AA Progress Index v1not in index237.5#292215.2#355Artificial Analysis
HELM Capabilities meannot in indexeffort not stated–79.8%#6HELM Capabilities

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Parasail36 tok/s0.42 s$0.140$0.800131kfp8
Venice24 tok/s0.64 s$0.150$0.750128kfp8
DeepInfra19 tok/s0.43 s$0.090$0.550262kfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.632$1.26$1.90$2.53Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.210 in · $0.840 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.200 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0003$0.000322.2 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0030$0.002925.0 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0025$0.002533.4 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.016$0.01556.8 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0006$0.000621.3 s

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3 235B A22B 2507's benchmark scores?
As of 29 Oct 2026, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (thinking effort) scores 51.9 ±4.0 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in long context (60) and weakest in agents & tools (39). That rests on 15 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 rank?
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (thinking effort) is #286 of 581 ranked configurations on 29 Oct 2026. 266 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 69.2.
How much does Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 cost per 1M tokens?
As of 29 Oct 2026, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.210 per 1M input tokens and $0.840 per 1M output tokens, $0.368 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 24 Oct 2026.
When was Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 released?
Alibaba released Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 on 22 Jul 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 29 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507.