GLM-5.1
Best configuration ranks #92 of 610 on the BenchLeader Index at 60.1 ±2.9. Last measured 8 Sept 2026. Released 7 Apr 2026.
- Blended price
- $2.15/M
- $1.40 in · $4.40 out
- Output speed
- 60 tok/s
- First answer
- 66 s
- first token 1.35 s
- Context
- 200k
- Overall index60
- Reasoning61
- Coding57
- Agents & tools57
- Maths53
- Knowledge57
- Instruction following74
- Human preference66
- Long context63
- Composite62
Reasoning-effort configurations
The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Default” means the publisher did not say which setting was used.
| Effort | Index | Rank | Speed | First answer | Chat reply cost | Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no reasoning | 52.6 | #244 | 38 tok/s | 1.97 s | $0.0019 | Agents & tools 65 · Composite 60 · Instruction following 53 · Knowledge 53 · Long context 53 · Maths 41 |
| defaultbest | 60.1 | #92 | 60 tok/s | 66 s | $0.0019 | Agents & tools 57 · Coding 57 · Composite 62 · Human preference 66 · Instruction following 74 · Knowledge 57 · Long context 63 · Maths 53 · Reasoning 61 |
Benchmark results
One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.
Reasoning
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | – | 89.9%#39 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| SimpleBench | – | 55.1%#39 | SimpleBench | |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1489#42 | LMArena | |
| GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index | 83.9%#150 | 86.8%#106 | Artificial Analysis | |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index | 27.9%#121 | 30.1%#103 | Artificial Analysis | |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals)not in index | – | 84.5%#50 | Vals AI |
Coding
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 74.2%#16 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| SciCode | – | 43.8%#90 | SciCode | |
| WeirdML | – | 57.1%#52 | WeirdML | |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1514#37 | LMArena | |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1508#39 | LMArena | |
| SciCode (AA)not in index | – | 44.8%#94 | Artificial Analysis | |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 81.4%#60 | Vals AI | |
| SWE-bench (Vals)not in index | – | 76.4%#35 | Vals AI |
Agents & tools
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 35.6%#72 | 43.2%#39 | Artificial Analysis | |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index | 97.1%#13 | 97.7%#9 | Artificial Analysis | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 56.9%#38 | Vals AI | |
| MCP Atlas | – | 75.6%#15 | Scale AI SEAL |
Maths
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 24.9%#65 | 36.8%#50 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 93.3%#44 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| ProofBench | – | 22.2%#32 | Vals AI | |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 91.9%#21 | Vals AI | |
| AIME 2026 | – | 95.8%#13 | MathArena | |
| HMMT February 2026 | – | 89.4%#14 | MathArena | |
| MathArena Apex | – | 11.5%#20 | MathArena |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 34.0%#46 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| AA-Omniscience | -22.4#189 | 0.8#88 | Artificial Analysis | |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 86.9%#36 | Vals AI | |
| LegalBench | – | 84.4%#30 | Vals AI | |
| CorpFin | – | 64.5%#37 | Vals AI | |
| TaxEval | – | 71.2%#79 | Vals AI |
Instruction following
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 52.0%#161 | 76.3%#22 | Artificial Analysis |
Human preference
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | – | 1466#44 | LMArena |
Long context
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | 53.3%#241 | 73.7%#125 | Artificial Analysis |
Composite
| Benchmark | no reasoning | default | Source | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in index | – | 149.7#46 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | |
| AA Intelligence Index | 24.2#125 | 26.4#106 | Artificial Analysis |
Where to run it
Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.
| Provider | Speed | First token | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Quantisation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friendli | 99 tok/s | 0.30 s | $1.40 | $4.40 | 203k | – |
| Crusoe | 78 tok/s | 0.56 s | $1.20 | $4.40 | 203k | fp8 |
| Baidu Qianfan | 60 tok/s | 0.97 s | $0.965 | $3.03 | 203k | fp8 |
| AtlasCloud | 58 tok/s | 1.21 s | $1.26 | $3.96 | 203k | fp8 |
| NovitaAI | 57 tok/s | 2.06 s | $1.38 | $4.40 | 205k | fp8 |
| GMICloud | 55 tok/s | 1.51 s | $1.40 | $4.40 | 203k | fp8 |
| DeepInfra | 53 tok/s | 0.91 s | $1.05 | $3.50 | 203k | fp4 |
| Venice | 51 tok/s | 1.30 s | $1.54 | $4.84 | 200k | fp8 |
| Alibaba Cloud Int. | 50 tok/s | 1.52 s | $1.33 | $4.18 | 203k | fp8 |
| StreamLake | 37 tok/s | 1.35 s | $0.966 | $3.04 | 200k | fp8 |
| SiliconFlow | 28 tok/s | 1.66 s | $1.19 | $3.74 | 205k | fp8 |
| Nebius Token Factory | 28 tok/s | 0.96 s | $1.40 | $4.40 | 203k | fp8 |
| Chutes | 24 tok/s | 5.73 s | $0.980 | $3.08 | 203k | fp8 |
| Phala | 21 tok/s | 3.93 s | $1.21 | $4.20 | 203k | – |
| Z.ai | 20 tok/s | 7.91 s | $1.40 | $4.40 | 203k | fp8 |
Price history
Listed price per 1M tokens over time, as recorded by OpenRouter for the provider with the longest history.
What a task costs
Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.260 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.
| Workload | Tokens in / out | Cost | With caching | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply | 400 / 300 | $0.0019 | $0.0015 | 1.2 min |
| Summarise a 30-page report | 12,000 / 600 | $0.019 | $0.0092 | 1.3 min |
| Code edit | 6,000 / 1,500 | $0.015 | $0.0099 | 1.5 min |
| Agentic coding session | 60,000 / 4,000 | $0.102 | $0.050 | 2.2 min |
| Structured extraction | 2,000 / 200 | $0.0037 | $0.0020 | 1.1 min |
See also
Data as of 9 Sept 2026. Compare these configurations.