BenchLeader

Qwen3 32B

Reasoning effort

Qwen3 32B is an Alibaba open-weights reasoning model, released 29 Apr 2025. Its best configuration ranks #344 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 51.5 ±4.6, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 312 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in agents & tools (59) and lowest in coding (45). At $1.23 per million tokens blended it is pricier than most ranked models. Output speed of 29 tokens per second puts it in the slowest quarter, with a first token in 0.4 s. It has been measured at 3 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$1.23/M
$0.700 in · $2.80 out
Output speed
29 tok/s
OpenRouter traffic, 7-day median; not yet measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
0.38 s
Context
131k
Full answer
–
Cost per run
–
Released
29 Apr 2025
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index52
  2. Reasoning50
  3. Coding45
  4. Agents & tools59
  5. Maths56
  6. Human preference51

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning39.6#68258 tok/s1.38 s$0.0002Composite 38 · Instruction following 35 · Long context 23 · Maths 34 · Reasoning 42
thinking40.0#66623 tok/s87 s$0.0003Agents & tools 34 · Composite 38 · Instruction following 40 · Knowledge 39 · Long context 23 · Reasoning 41
not statedbest51.5#34429 tok/s0.38 s$0.0011Agents & tools 59 · Coding 45 · Human preference 51 · Maths 56 · Reasoning 50

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 23 Oct 2026
354657
  • not stated
  • thinking
  • no reasoning

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
GPQA Diamond54.1%#206–65.7%#180Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated––1367#199Arena (LMArena)
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index53.5%#41166.8%#328–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index4.1%#5367.4%#365–Artificial Analysis
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.7%#88––Kagi LLM Benchmark
CritPt–0.3%#271–Artificial Analysis
SciPredictnot in indexeffort not stated––17.0%#11Scale AI SEAL
LMCAnot in indexeffort not stated––17.3%#165Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DTBenchnot in indexeffort not stated––67.5%#164Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub

Coding

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
SciCodeeffort not stated–35.4%#191SciCode
Arena Codingeffort not stated–1406#190Arena (LMArena)
SciCode (AA)not in index36.0%#199–Artificial Analysis
Aider Polygloteffort not stated–40.0%#31Aider polyglot leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index0.0%#152–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index5.2%#205–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench Hard3.0%#314–Artificial Analysis
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)not in index29.8%#260–Artificial Analysis
BFCL Overalleffort not stated–48.7%#25Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard
τ³-Banking (AA)5.4%#179–Artificial Analysis
AutomationBenchnot in index1.0%#195–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index1.6%#194–Artificial Analysis
BrowseComp-Plusnot in indexeffort not stated–3.6%#21BrowseComp-Plus

Maths

Benchmarkno reasoningnot statedSourceTrend
OTIS Mock AIME23.1%#21766.9%#148Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Mathseffort not stated–1399#151Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Instruction following

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
IFBench31.5%#35136.3%#302–Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in indexeffort not stated––1331#208Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1347#205Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1304#213Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1337#208Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1355#200Arena (LMArena)

Long context

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingSourceTrend
AA-LCR0.0%#4930.0%#493Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkno reasoningthinkingnot statedSourceTrend
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in indexeffort not stated––138.4#120Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.27.3#4807.2#488–Artificial Analysis

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Tenstorrent44 tok/s0.50 s$0.140$0.40020kfp8
DeepInfra42 tok/s0.38 s$0.080$0.28041kfp8
SiliconFlow27 tok/s1.09 s$0.140$0.570131kfp8

Price history

The price above, per 1M tokens, every day it changed.

$0.00$0.770$1.54$2.31$3.08Sept 26Oct 26
input outputnow $0.700 in · $2.80 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0011–10.7 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.010–21.1 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0084–52.1 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.053–2.3 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0020–7.3 s

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3 32B's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3 32B scores 51.5 ±4.6 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in agents & tools (59) and weakest in coding (45). That rests on 9 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3 32B rank?
Qwen3 32B is #344 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 312 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Qwen3 32B cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3 32B costs $0.700 per 1M input tokens and $2.80 per 1M output tokens, $1.23 blended (three input tokens per output token). The list price last changed on 24 Oct 2026.
When was Qwen3 32B released?
Alibaba released Qwen3 32B on 29 Apr 2025. BenchLeader has results for it at 3 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3 32B: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-32b.