ForecastBench leaderboard
As of 6 Nov 2026, the top score on ForecastBench is 67.0% by GPT-5.5 (OpenAI), ahead of Claude Opus 5 at 66.5%, across 85 model configurations with a published result (ForecastBench, result dated 23 Apr 2026). Models forecast real-world questions; scores accrue as the questions resolve, compared with superforecasters. ForecastBench is shown for reference only and does not count toward the BenchLeader Index.
Key facts (as of 6 Nov 2026)
- GPT-5.5 holds the top ForecastBench score at 67.0% (ForecastBench, 23 Apr 2026).
- Claude Opus 5 is second on ForecastBench at 66.5% (ForecastBench, 24 Jul 2026).
- ForecastBench: Forecasting real future events, scored as they resolve (ForecastBench).
- 85 model configurations have a published ForecastBench result on BenchLeader (BenchLeader, 6 Nov 2026).
- ForecastBench does not feed the BenchLeader Index; it is shown for reference (BenchLeader methodology).
Forecasting real future events, scored as they resolve.
- Published by
- ForecastBenchdata via Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
- Category
- Reasoning
- Index weight
- Reference only
- Models
- 85
- Data as of
- 6 Nov 2026
CC BY 4.0 — Epoch AI, ‘AI Benchmarking Hub’, epoch.ai/benchmarks. Mirrored boards credit their original publishers.
What the test looks like
Models forecast real-world questions; scores accrue as the questions resolve, compared with superforecasters.
How it is scored
Overall Brier-based score, as published by ForecastBench.
What to keep in mind
Scores change as events resolve; a lower Brier score is better and the site rescales it.
- 1GPT-5.5 (high)67.0%
- 2Claude Opus 5 (max)66.5%
- 3GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)66.5%
- 4Claude Opus 4.8 (max)66.4%
- 5Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)66.2%
- 6Claude Fable 5 (max)66.0%
- 7Grok 4.5 (high)66.0%
- 8Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium)65.9%
- 9Claude Fable 5 (high)65.7%
- 10GPT-5.6 Sol (pro)65.6%
- 11GPT-5.6 Sol (max)65.5%
- 12Gemini 3.1 Pro (high)65.5%
- 13Grok 4.6 (xhigh)65.5%
- 14GPT-565.3%
- 15Gemini 3 Pro65.2%
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67.0% | 63.7 | 2026-04-23 | |
| 2 | 66.5% | 65.4 | 2026-07-24 | |
| 3 | 66.5% | 61.5 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 4 | 66.4% | 60.2 | 2026-05-28 | |
| 5 | 66.2% | 62.2 | 2026-08-13 | |
| 6 | 66.0% | 65.3 | 2026-06-09 | |
| 7 | 66.0% | 56.9 | 2026-07-08 | |
| 8 | 65.9% | – | 2026-07-21 | |
| 9 | 65.7% | 64.3 | 2026-06-09 | |
| 10 | 65.6% | – | 2026-07-09 | |
| 11 | 65.5% | 65.4 | 2026-07-09 | |
| 12 | 65.5% | 60.1 | 2026-02-19 | |
| 13 | 65.5% | 57.9 | 2026-08-12 | |
| 14 | 65.3% | 57.7 | 2025-08-07 | |
| 15 | 65.2% | 60.2 | 2025-11-18 | |
| 16 | 65.0% | 58.3 | 2025-07-09 | |
| 17 | 64.9% | 57.9 | 2025-11-24 | |
| 18 | 64.9% | – | 2025-09-19 | |
| 19 | 64.8% | 55.6 | 2025-11-19 | |
| 20 | 64.8% | 50.8 | 2025-02-27 | |
| 21 | 64.7% | 62.1 | 2026-07-16 | |
| 22 | 64.7% | 56.9 | 2025-12-17 | |
| 23 | 64.7% | 51.4 | 2025-08-05 | |
| 24 | 64.6% | 61.0 | 2025-04-16 | |
| 25 | 64.5% | 61.7 | 2026-04-23 | |
| 26 | 64.5% | 58.4 | 2026-02-17 | |
| 27 | 64.4% | 54.5 | 2025-03-31 | |
| 28 | 64.4% | 48.6 | 2026-05-19 | |
| 29 | 64.3% | 60.5 | 2026-02-19 | |
| 30 | 64.3% | 58.2 | 2026-02-17 | |
| 31 | 64.3% | 56.4 | 2026-06-01 | |
| 32 | 64.2% | 57.9 | 2025-12-11 | |
| 33 | 64.2% | 56.9 | 2025-04-16 | |
| 34 | 64.2% | 50.5 | 2025-05-22 | |
| 35 | 64.1% | 53.7 | 2025-09-29 | |
| 36 | 64.1% | 50.0 | 2025-04-29 | |
| 37 | 64.0% | 49.9 | 2025-02-24 | |
| 38 | 63.8% | 50.7 | 2025-01-31 | |
| 39 | 63.7% | 54.8 | 2026-02-11 | |
| 40 | 63.5% | 55.9 | 2026-06-30 | |
| 41 | 63.4% | 62.3 | 2026-02-05 | |
| 42 | 63.4% | 54.5 | 2026-04-17 | |
| 43 | 63.4% | 47.6 | 2025-10-15 | |
| 44 | 63.3% | 56.4 | 2025-08-07 | |
| 45 | 63.3% | – | 2026-02-17 | |
| 46 | 63.2% | 47.1 | 2024-10-22 | |
| 47 | 63.2% | 41.2 | 2024-04-09 | |
| 48 | 63.1% | 63.1 | 2026-04-16 | |
| 49 | 63.1% | 58.0 | 2026-03-05 | |
| 50 | 62.9% | 52.7 | 2025-06-17 | |
| 51 | 62.8% | 52.4 | 2026-03-03 | |
| 52 | 62.7% | 60.0 | 2026-05-28 | |
| 53 | 62.7% | 51.8 | 2025-09-05 | |
| 54 | 62.6% | 44.4 | 2024-12-26 | |
| 55 | 62.6% | 41.9 | 2024-07-23 | |
| 56 | 62.4% | 39.0 | 2024-02-29 | |
| 57 | 62.3% | 56.8 | 2025-11-13 | |
| 58 | 62.3% | 48.5 | 2025-04-14 | |
| 59 | 62.2% | 51.9 | 2025-07-25 | |
| 60 | 62.2% | 51.0 | 2025-07-12 |
More reasoning benchmarks · All LLM benchmarks
Related benchmarks
Top head-to-heads on ForecastBench
Cite as: BenchLeader, “ForecastBench leaderboard”, data as of 6 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/benchmarks/forecastbench.
ForecastBench: questions
- What does ForecastBench measure?
- Models forecast real-world questions; scores accrue as the questions resolve, compared with superforecasters. Scores are reported in percent of tasks solved; higher is better.
- What is the top score on ForecastBench?
- As of 6 Nov 2026, the highest score on ForecastBench is 67.0% by GPT-5.5 (result dated 23 Apr 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 5 at 66.5%. Scores come from ForecastBench and are re-read daily.
- Which AI model leads ForecastBench?
- GPT-5.5 leads ForecastBench with 67.0% as of 6 Nov 2026 (result dated 23 Apr 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 5 at 66.5%.
- How many models have ForecastBench results?
- 85 model configurations have a ForecastBench result on BenchLeader, all taken from ForecastBench via Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub.
- Who runs ForecastBench and how often is it updated?
- ForecastBench is published by ForecastBench. BenchLeader re-reads the published results once a day and records the date each result was published.
- Does ForecastBench count toward the BenchLeader Index?
- No. ForecastBench is shown for reference but left out of the composite index.