Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon
Full profiles: Dola Seed 2.0 Pro (ByteDance) and Gemini 4 Carbon (Google): every benchmark, price and rank.
Updated · Data from 4 sources
As of 29 Oct 2026, Gemini 4 Carbon is ahead of Dola Seed 2.0 Pro on quality (65.1 vs 58.5 on the BenchLeader Index). Gemini 4 Carbon leads in every category we measure both in.
Key facts (as of 29 Oct 2026)
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro scores 58.5 on the BenchLeader Index and Gemini 4 Carbon scores 65.1 (BenchLeader, 29 Oct 2026).
- Gemini 4 Carbon costs $8.00 per 1M tokens blended (list price, 29 Oct 2026).
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro benchmarks ByteDance
Gemini 4 Carbon benchmarks high GoogleOpen in the comparison toolWhich to pick for…
The pick's numbers come first. Category scores on the BenchLeader scale (50 is the average model, 15 points one standard deviation). High confidence means a lead of half a standard deviation or more; under one point is called either.
| Use case | Pick | Why | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Gemini 4 Carbon | 72 vs 65 category score | Medium |
| Reasoning | Gemini 4 Carbon | 79 vs 65 category score | High |
| Chat quality (human preference) | – | Only Dola Seed 2.0 Pro has an Arena rating (64 category score) | Not comparable |
| High volume on a budget | Neither flagship | A smaller model is usually the better fit: Cheapest good LLMs, Fastest LLMs | – |
Key differences
- Gemini 4 Carbon (high) leads on quality: 65.1 vs 58.5.
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro is stronger in human preference, maths, multimodal.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (high) is stronger in coding, reasoning, knowledge, long context.
At a glance
| Spec | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance | |
| Released | – | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Context window (tokens) | – | 1,000,000 |
| Compared at | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Price in / out / cached input per 1M | – | $4.00 / $20.00 / – |
Category by category
Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.
| Category | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 64.5 | 78.9 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Coding | 65.0 | 71.7 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Maths | 62.7 | – | not comparable |
| Knowledge | – | 75.8 | not comparable |
| Human preference | 64.2 | – | not comparable |
| Multimodal | 61.3 | – | not comparable |
| Long context | – | 64.5 | not comparable |
Where sources disagree
Across the 0 benchmarks both have, Dola Seed 2.0 Pro leads 0, Gemini 4 Carbon leads 0. Every overall index that rates both puts Gemini 4 Carbon ahead.
| Overall index | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 58.5 | 65.1 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
Each publisher runs its own tasks, harnesses and effort settings, so their overall verdicts can differ; BenchLeader reconciles them on one scale. † measured at another effort setting of the same model (the publisher did not test the one compared here).
Price, speed and latency
List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page; suite cost is what Artificial Analysis paid to run its whole Intelligence Index.
| Measure | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Blended price per 1M tokens | – | $8.00 |
| Input / output per 1M | – / – | $4.00 / $20.00 |
| Price per task: chat reply | – | $0.0076 |
| Price per task: summarize a 30-page report | – | $0.060 |
| Price per task: code edit | – | $0.054 |
| Price per task: agentic coding session | – | $0.320 |
| Price per task: structured extraction | – | $0.012 |
| Cost to run a full benchmark suite | – | $7.76 |
| Output speed | – | 100 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 103.1 s |
| Time to a complete answer | – | 108.1 s |
Each model is compared at its best-ranked reasoning-effort setting. Dola Seed 2.0 Pro scores 58.5. Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 65.1 and takes 103 s to its first answer token. Higher effort means more thinking before the answer: better scores, longer waits and more tokens billed. How reasoning effort changes scores and cost.
Every benchmark
38 benchmarks, grouped by category; each name links to the board and its leaders. † measured at another effort setting of the same model, shown for reference and not counted as a win.
| Metric | Publisher | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | BenchLeader | 58.5 | 65.1 |
| Coding score | BenchLeader | 65.0 | 71.7 |
| Human preference score | BenchLeader | 64.2 | – |
| Maths score | BenchLeader | 62.7 | – |
| Multimodal score | BenchLeader | 61.3 | – |
| Reasoning score | BenchLeader | 64.5 | 78.9 |
| Knowledge score | BenchLeader | – | 75.8 |
| Long context score | BenchLeader | – | 64.5 |
| Blended price $/M | BenchLeader | – | $8.00 |
| Output speed | BenchLeader | – | 100 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | BenchLeader | – | 103.1 s |
| Context window | BenchLeader | – | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Reasoning | |||
| Arena Hard Prompts | Arena (LMArena) | 1480 | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 60.4% |
| HLE-Diamond (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 69.1% |
| CritPt | Artificial Analysis | – | 36.0% |
| CritPt v2 hard subset (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 63.0% |
| Coding | |||
| SciCode | SciCode | – | 64.2% |
| Arena Coding | Arena (LMArena) | 1514 | – |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | Vals AI | – | 89.1% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 65.2% |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 48.5% |
| FrontierCode 2.0 (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 40.6% |
| Agents & tools | |||
| Finance Agent v2.1 | Vals AI | – | 67.2% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1.1 | Vals AI | – | 17.5% |
| Legal Research Bench | Vals AI | – | 55.8% |
| Tax Agent Bench | Vals AI | – | 48.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | Vals AI | – | 63.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Andon Labs | – | 16484.2† |
| AutomationBench | Artificial Analysis | – | 77.8% |
| GDP.pdf (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 28.4% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | Artificial Analysis | – | 1609 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA) | Artificial Analysis | – | 64.8% |
| Maths | |||
| Arena Maths | Arena (LMArena) | 1449 | – |
| Knowledge | |||
| AA-Omniscience v1.1 | Artificial Analysis | – | 53.5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 | Vals AI | – | 76.5% |
| AA-Omniscience v1.1: accuracy | Artificial Analysis | – | 58.3% |
Show all 38 benchmarks
| Metric | Publisher | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | |||
| AA-Omniscience v1.1: non-hallucination | Artificial Analysis | – | 88.6% |
| Instruction following | |||
| Arena Instruction Following | Arena (LMArena) | 1435 | – |
| Human preference | |||
| Arena Text | Arena (LMArena) | 1456 | – |
| Arena Creative Writing | Arena (LMArena) | 1403 | – |
| Arena Multi-turn | Arena (LMArena) | 1449 | – |
| Arena Longer Queries | Arena (LMArena) | 1452 | – |
| Multimodal | |||
| Arena Vision | Arena (LMArena) | 1274 | – |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | – | 58.6%† |
| Long context | |||
| AA-LCR v1.1 | Artificial Analysis | – | 79.3% |
| Composite | |||
| AA Intelligence Index v5.0 | Artificial Analysis | – | 59.4 |
| AA Progress Index v1 | Artificial Analysis | – | 351.6 |
| Vals Index | Vals AI | – | 70.4 |
| Vals Finance Index | Vals AI | – | 66.3% |
Data as of 2026-10-29. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
What changed
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro: BenchLeader Index 59.1 → 58.5.
Related comparisons
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Astra
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon
Rankings: Best LLM overall · Best LLM for coding · Best LLM for agents · Best cheap LLMs
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than Dola Seed 2.0 Pro?
- Gemini 4 Carbon (high) leads on quality: 65.1 vs 58.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Carbon (high) is ahead overall as of 29 Oct 2026, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Dola Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 4 Carbon better for coding?
- Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher in coding (72 vs 65 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- When was Gemini 4 Carbon released?
- Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 28 Oct 2026.