METR Time Horizons leaderboard
As of 6 Nov 2026, the top score on METR Time Horizons is 85.2% by Claude Mythos Preview (Anthropic), ahead of Claude Opus 4.6 at 78.9%, across 40 model configurations with a published result (METR, result dated 7 Apr 2026). Software and research tasks of increasing length; METR fits the task duration at which a model succeeds half the time. METR Time Horizons is shown for reference only and does not count toward the BenchLeader Index.
Key facts (as of 6 Nov 2026)
- Claude Mythos Preview holds the top METR Time Horizons score at 85.2% (METR, 7 Apr 2026).
- Claude Opus 4.6 is second on METR Time Horizons at 78.9% (METR, 5 Feb 2026).
- METR Time Horizons: METR's task suite behind the 50%-time-horizon measure (METR).
- 40 model configurations have a published METR Time Horizons result on BenchLeader (BenchLeader, 6 Nov 2026).
- METR Time Horizons does not feed the BenchLeader Index; it is shown for reference (BenchLeader methodology).
METR's task suite behind the 50%-time-horizon measure.
- Published by
- METRdata via Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
- Category
- Agents & tools
- Index weight
- Reference only
- Models
- 40
- Data as of
- 6 Nov 2026
CC BY 4.0 — Epoch AI, ‘AI Benchmarking Hub’, epoch.ai/benchmarks. Mirrored boards credit their original publishers.
What the test looks like
Software and research tasks of increasing length; METR fits the task duration at which a model succeeds half the time.
How it is scored
Average success across the task suite, as published by METR.
What to keep in mind
The headline METR number is a fitted time horizon; this is the underlying success rate.
- 1Claude Mythos Preview85.2%
- 2Claude Opus 4.678.9%
- 3Gemini 3.1 Pro77.0%
- 4GPT-5.2 (high)75.3%
- 5Claude Opus 4.575.0%
- 6GPT-5.3-Codex74.5%
- 7GPT-5.4 (xhigh)74.3%
- 8Gemini 3 Pro71.0%
- 9GPT-5.1-Codex-Max (max)70.8%
- 10GPT-5 (medium)69.6%
- 11GPT-5 (high)69.4%
- 12Claude Sonnet 4.567.4%
- 13Claude Opus 4.166.8%
- 14Grok 466.6%
- 15o3 (medium)65.4%
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 85.2% | – | 2026-04-07 | |
| 2 | 78.9% | 62.3 | 2026-02-05 | |
| 3 | 77.0% | 60.5 | 2026-02-19 | |
| 4 | 75.3% | 56.0 | 2025-12-11 | |
| 5 | 75.0% | 57.9 | 2025-11-24 | |
| 6 | 74.5% | – | 2026-02-05 | |
| 7 | 74.3% | 63.2 | 2026-03-05 | |
| 8 | 71.0% | 60.2 | 2025-11-18 | |
| 9 | 70.8% | – | 2025-11-19 | |
| 10 | 69.6% | 58.1 | 2025-08-07 | |
| 11 | 69.4% | 57.9 | 2025-08-07 | |
| 12 | 67.4% | 53.7 | 2025-09-29 | |
| 13 | 66.8% | 51.4 | 2025-08-05 | |
| 14 | 66.6% | 58.3 | 2025-07-09 | |
| 15 | 65.4% | 53.3 | 2025-04-16 | |
| 16 | 63.9% | 52.6 | 2025-05-22 | |
| 17 | 63.9% | 51.8 | 2025-04-16 | |
| 18 | 63.6% | 61.0 | 2025-04-16 | |
| 19 | 62.0% | 50.5 | 2025-05-22 | |
| 20 | 60.0% | 49.9 | 2025-02-24 | |
| 21 | 59.2% | 53.2 | 2025-11-06 | |
| 22 | 56.6% | 45.5 | 2025-08-05 | |
| 23 | 55.4% | 54.5 | 2025-06-05 | |
| 24 | 53.8% | 49.3 | 2025-05-28 | |
| 25 | 51.9% | 47.3 | 2025-01-20 | |
| 26 | 51.0% | 48.1 | 2024-12-17 | |
| 27 | 47.4% | 44.4 | 2024-12-26 | |
| 28 | 45.2% | 47.1 | 2024-10-22 | |
| 29 | 45.1% | 53.4 | 2024-09-12 | |
| 30 | 40.8% | 43.3 | 2024-05-13 | |
| 31 | 36.7% | 41.2 | 2024-04-09 | |
| 32 | 36.1% | 42.4 | 2023-03-14 | |
| 33 | 35.8% | 43.2 | 2024-09-19 | |
| 34 | 35.2% | – | 2024-01-25 | |
| 35 | 29.9% | 41.3 | 2024-06-07 | |
| 36 | 29.5% | 39.0 | 2024-02-29 | |
| 37 | 28.9% | – | 2023-11-06 | |
| 38 | 21.5% | – | 2023-09-18 | |
| 39 | 16.2% | – | – | |
| 40 | 10.1% | – | 2019-11-05 |
More agents & tools benchmarks · All LLM benchmarks
Related benchmarks
Top head-to-heads on METR Time Horizons
Cite as: BenchLeader, “METR Time Horizons leaderboard”, data as of 6 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/benchmarks/metr_time_horizons.
METR Time Horizons: questions
- What does METR Time Horizons measure?
- Software and research tasks of increasing length; METR fits the task duration at which a model succeeds half the time. Scores are reported in percent of tasks solved; higher is better.
- What is the top score on METR Time Horizons?
- As of 6 Nov 2026, the highest score on METR Time Horizons is 85.2% by Claude Mythos Preview (result dated 7 Apr 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 4.6 at 78.9%. Scores come from METR and are re-read daily.
- Which AI model leads METR Time Horizons?
- Claude Mythos Preview leads METR Time Horizons with 85.2% as of 6 Nov 2026 (result dated 7 Apr 2026), ahead of Claude Opus 4.6 at 78.9%.
- How many models have METR Time Horizons results?
- 40 model configurations have a METR Time Horizons result on BenchLeader, all taken from METR via Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub.
- Who runs METR Time Horizons and how often is it updated?
- METR Time Horizons is published by METR. BenchLeader re-reads the published results once a day and records the date each result was published.
- Does METR Time Horizons count toward the BenchLeader Index?
- No. METR Time Horizons is shown for reference but left out of the composite index.