BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 are level on quality (63.1 vs 63.4).
  • Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, knowledge, maths.
  • GPT-5.4 is stronger in composite, instruction following, long context, multimodal.
  • GPT-5.4 is 1.8× cheaper ($5.63 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • GPT-5.4 streams 3.4× faster (130 vs 38 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4
BenchLeader Index63.163.4
Agents & tools score68.866.1
Coding score62.351.6
Composite score69.278.1
Human preference score64.664.5
Instruction following score53.771.7
Knowledge score70.566.8
Long context score65.567.6
Maths score65.6
Multimodal score63.664.0
Reasoning score62.362.3
Blended price $/M$10.00$5.63
Output speed38 tok/s130 tok/s
Time to first answer2.0 s126.4 s
Context window1M1.1M
GPQA Diamond90.5%
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch)78.7%
Humanity's Last Exam19.0%
Terminal-Bench79.8%81.8%
SimpleBench67.6%
Cybench93.0%
Remote Labor Index4.2%
WeirdML77.9%
APEX-Agents32.4%34.9%
FrontierCode26.6%
GSO-Bench33.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.3156.9
LMArena Text14981466
LMArena Hard Prompts15271488
LMArena Coding15461514
LMArena WebDev15371386
LMArena Vision13111293
AA Intelligence Index31.939.0
IFBench53.1%74.0%
AA-LCR78.0%82.0%
MMMU-Pro75.4%78.4%
AA-Omniscience13.75.8
Terminal-Bench Hard48.5%57.6%
GPQA Diamond (AA)89.6%92.0%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)39.9%43.7%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)92.1%87.1%
HiL-Bench38.3%9.7%
EQ-Bench 412231272
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.4%63.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.6%
SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold)75.6%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.