Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7
Agnes 3.0 Flash 
Claude Opus 4.7 Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 64.5 vs 62.3.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, composite, long context, reasoning.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in knowledge, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is 133× cheaper ($0.075 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Agnes 3.0 Flash | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.3 | 64.5 |
| Agents & tools score | 76.8 | 67.5 |
| Composite score | 74.0 | – |
| Knowledge score | 59.1 | 62.3 |
| Long context score | 67.0 | – |
| Reasoning score | 71.1 | 66.5 |
| Coding score | – | 64.7 |
| Human preference score | – | 69.0 |
| Maths score | – | 67.5 |
| Multimodal score | – | 67.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.075 | $10.00 |
| Output speed | – | 53 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 1.6 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Humanity's Last Exam | – | 36.2% |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 80.2% |
| SimpleBench | – | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | – | 76.4% |
| FrontierCode | – | 38.5% |
| GSO-Bench | – | 44.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1494 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1519 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1547 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1557 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1318 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 35.5 | – |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | -10.6 | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.4% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | – |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | – |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 96.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 85.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.9% |
| LegalBench | – | 85.3% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.1% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 68.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 82.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 56.1 |
| HiL-Bench | – | 41.7% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1311 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | – | 73.3% |
| CritPt | 15.1% | – |
| GDPval (AA) | 53.7% | – |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 47.6% | – |
| CaseLaw v2 | – | 68.4% |
| Code Migration | – | 43.9% |
| CyberBench | – | 52.1% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 63.7% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 51.5% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 6.7% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 38.5% |
| MedCode | – | 54.9% |
| MedScribe | – | 83.0% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 85.5% |
| MortgageTax | – | 70.3% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.0% |
| SAGE | – | 56.1% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals) | – | 68.5% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 67.4% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 71.0% |
| SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA | – | 40.3% |
| SWE Atlas: Refactoring | – | 48.6% |
| SWE Atlas: Test Writing | – | 38.5% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1481 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1515 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1507 |
| LMArena Search | – | 1212 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1494 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | – | 13.0% |
| ExploitBench | – | 26.5% |
| ForecastBench | – | 59.6% |
| GBAEval | – | 43.8% |
| ALE-Bench | – | 1323.0 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | – | 10936.8 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | – | 24.5% |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7: questions
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Claude Opus 4.7?
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 64.5 vs 62.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.7 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Claude Opus 4.7 for agentic tasks?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (77 vs 68 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Claude Opus 4.7?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper: $0.075 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.