BenchLeader

Which AI benchmarks are saturated?

Data as of 2 Nov 2026 · last updated · by BenchLeader

Of the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated and 37 near-saturated: the top models score too close to the ceiling to tell apart. A percentage-scored board is saturated when its fifth-best model scores 90% or more; 165 boards are still active and 22 are retired (no new result for a year). Maths boards saturate most: 10 of 18.

Benchmark status by categoryOf the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated and 37 near-saturated: the top models score too close to the ceiling to tell apart.Benchmark status by categorySaturatedNear-saturatedActiveRetiredReasoningReasoning: 8 saturatedReasoning: 2 near-saturatedReasoning: 18 activeReasoning: 8 retired36CodingCoding: 4 saturatedCoding: 7 near-saturatedCoding: 30 activeCoding: 2 retired43Agents & toolsAgents & tools: 1 saturatedAgents & tools: 7 near-saturatedAgents & tools: 55 activeAgents & tools: 1 retired64MathsMaths: 10 saturatedMaths: 1 near-saturatedMaths: 5 activeMaths: 2 retired18KnowledgeKnowledge: 4 saturatedKnowledge: 6 near-saturatedKnowledge: 19 activeKnowledge: 4 retired33Instruction followingInstruction following: 1 saturatedInstruction following: 3 near-saturatedInstruction following: 4 active8Human preferenceHuman preference: 5 activeHuman preference: 1 retired6MultimodalMultimodal: 7 near-saturatedMultimodal: 12 activeMultimodal: 4 retired23Long contextLong context: 2 near-saturatedLong context: 2 active4CompositeComposite: 2 near-saturatedComposite: 12 active14Safety & honestySafety & honesty: 1 saturatedSafety & honesty: 2 active3MetadataMetadata: 1 active1BenchLeader · data as of 2 Nov 2026 · CC BY 4.0www.benchleader.com/stats/benchmark-saturation
Of the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated and 37 near-saturated: the top models score too close to the ceiling to tell apart. Chart image (SVG)

Key statistics

Each statistic has its own link (#) to cite it directly.

  • Of the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated, 37 near-saturated, 165 active and 22 retired (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #
  • Maths has the largest share of saturated boards: 10 of 18 (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #
  • GPQA Diamond is saturated: the fifth-best model scores 95.4% (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #
  • ARC-AGI-2 is saturated: the fifth-best model scores 91.3% (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #
  • Humanity's Last Exam is still active: the leader scores 54.8% (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #
  • The hardest active boards with 10 or more models are GDPx (best score 12%) and Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 (best score 13.1%) (BenchLeader, 2 Nov 2026). #

Saturation by category

CategorySaturatedNear-saturatedActiveRetiredTotal
Reasoning8218836
Coding4730243
Agents & tools1755164
Maths1015218
Knowledge4619433
Instruction following134–8
Human preference––516
Multimodal–712423
Long context–22–4
Composite–212–14
Safety & honesty1–2–3
Metadata––1–1
All293716522253

Saturated benchmarks (29)

The fifth-best model scores 90% or more. Each model counts once, at its best score.

BenchmarkCategoryFifth-bestLeaderLeader scoreModels
OTIS Mock AIMEMaths100%Claude Opus 5.5100%278
ProofBenchMaths99%Claude Opus 5.5100%82
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)Agents & tools98.5%GLM 5.299.1%415
ARC-AGI-1Reasoning98.5%GPT-6 Astra98.5%257
AIME 2026Maths98.3%GPT-5.5100%31
DTBenchReasoning97.6%Claude Opus 5.598.9%230
LiveBench MathematicsMaths96.7%Claude Opus 5.597.1%68
AIME (Vals)Maths96.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro98.1%92
HMMT February 2026Maths96.2%GPT-5.598.5%31
MedQAKnowledge96.1%o196.5%91
SWE-bench (Vals)Coding95.4%Claude Opus 597%86
LiveBench 2.0 CodingCoding95.4%Claude Fable 5.197.7%31
GPQA DiamondReasoning95.4%Gemini 4 Argon96.4%295
MATH 500Maths95.2%Gemini 3 Pro96.4%57
GPQA Diamond (AA)Reasoning94.1%GPT-6 Astra96.3%563
GPQA Diamond (Vals)Reasoning93.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro95.5%131
MGSMMaths93.9%Claude Opus 4.595.2%71
IFEval (HELM)Instruction following92.9%Grok 3 mini95.1%68
MASKSafety & honesty92.5%Claude Opus 4.696.3%64
LiveBench 2.0 ReasoningReasoning91.7%Gemini 4 Argon95.1%31
LiveBench 1.0 ReasoningReasoning91.7%GPT-6 Astra92.7%68
ARC-AGI-2Reasoning91.3%GPT-6 Astra95%257
Global-MMLU-Lite (AA)Knowledge91.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro93.2%32
IOICoding91.2%GPT-6 Astra100%46
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Coding90.3%Claude Sonnet 5.592.4%121
MMLU-ProKnowledge90.2%Claude Fable 5.192.4%131
FrontierMath Tier 4Maths90.2%GPT-6.1 Sol100%76
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Maths90.2%GPT-6 Astra93.7%120
MedScribeKnowledge90.1%Claude Opus 5.591.4%107

Near-saturated benchmarks (37)

The leader is at 90% or more, or the fifth-best model at 80% or more.

BenchmarkCategoryFifth-bestLeaderLeader scoreModels
WeirdMLCoding89.4%GPT-6 Astra93.6%157
LiveCodeBench (AA)Coding89.4%Gemini 3 Pro91.8%304
AIME 2025 (AA)Maths89.3%Nova 2.0 Lite94.3%78
LiveBench BrowserAgents & tools89.3%GPT-6.1 Sol93.3%31
SAGEMultimodal89.3%Claude Opus 5.591.3%28
MMMU-Pro (Vals)Multimodal89.0%Claude Fable 5.190.6%91
Fiction.LiveBench 120kLong context88.9%o3100%35
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)Coding88.8%Claude Fable 5.191.4%238
LiveBench LanguageInstruction following88.7%Claude Fable 590.7%68
LiveCodeBenchCoding88.7%Claude Fable 5.190.5%138
Surface Evolver BenchCoding87.5%Claude Fable 595%29
LegalBenchKnowledge87.4%Claude Fable 588.6%145
MMLU-Pro (HELM)Knowledge86.3%Gemini 3 Pro90.3%68
FACTS SearchAgents & tools86.2%GPT-6 Astra89.9%22
WildBench (HELM)Instruction following85.9%Qwen3 235B A22B 250786.6%68
MMMU-ProMultimodal85.6%Gemini 4 Carbon89.3%292
AA-LCR v1.1Long context85.3%Kimi K388.7%560
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)Agents & tools84.6%Claude Opus 5.587.6%75
LiveBench ResearchKnowledge84.5%Muse Wonder88%31
MCP AtlasAgents & tools84.2%Muse Spark 1.188.1%34
LiveBench 1.0 CodingCoding83.9%Claude Sonnet 5.591.4%68
Kagi LLM BenchmarkReasoning83.5%Claude Fable 591.4%136
LiveBench DesignMultimodal83.1%Claude Opus 5.586.9%31
AA-Omniscience v1.1: non-hallucinationKnowledge82.0%Gemini 4 Carbon95.8%110
LiveBench 1.0Composite81.6%Claude Fable 5.183.4%68
LiveBench 2.0 Data AnalysisKnowledge81.6%Gemini 4 Argon85.2%31
LiveBench 1.0 Data AnalysisKnowledge81.2%GPT-6 Astra83.0%68
MMMU (validation)Multimodal80.7%GPT-5.185.4%50
IFBenchInstruction following80.5%Grok 4.383.3%425
Startrise FrontendCoding80.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro82.5%37
LiveBench 2.0Composite80.0%Claude Fable 5.185.7%31
GeoBenchMultimodal80%Gemini 3 Flash88%27
CyberGym end-to-end (AA)Agents & tools76.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro94.7%22
VPCTMultimodal58.7%Gemini 3 Pro91%30
CybenchAgents & tools42%Claude Opus 4.693%21
ARC-AGI-3Reasoning35%GPT-6 Astra99.9%70
Time Horizon Index: KSPAgents & tools23.8%Claude Opus 5.591.3%13

Hardest active benchmarks

Active percentage-scored boards with results for 10 or more models, lowest leading score first.

BenchmarkCategoryFifth-bestLeaderLeader scoreModels
GDPxAgents & tools8.5%Claude Opus 5.512%20
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1Agents & tools8.6%Muse Wonder Full13.1%28
BTF-3Reasoning14.1%GLM 5.3 Flash14.9%13
ProgramBenchCoding3%Claude Opus 5.518.5%63
Remote Labor IndexAgents & tools16.1%Claude Opus 5.521.3%17
CL-bench LifeReasoning16.9%GPT-5.522.2%16
SciPredictReasoning22.2%Gemini 3 Pro25.3%15
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1Agents & tools19.6%Muse Spark 1.225.4%79
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1.1Agents & tools18.3%Gemini 4 Argon27.1%33
CL-benchReasoning20.8%GPT-5.427.9%21

What replaced them

For saturated and retired boards, the live benchmarks that test the same skill and still separate the top models.

How these numbers are made

BenchLeader judges saturation only on percent-scored benchmarks with results for at least 10 models. Saturated: the fifth-best model (one score per model, its best) is at 90% or more, so the leaders are separated by noise. Near-saturated: the leader is at 90% or more, or the fifth-best at 80% or more. Retired: no new result for more than 365 days. Other benchmarks (Elo ratings, dollar amounts, small boards) are ‘active’ unless retired. Counts are benchmarks BenchLeader tracks from 45 publishers, not every benchmark published.

Some trackers call a benchmark saturated when the top model passes 90%. BenchLeader uses the fifth-best model, so one outlier result cannot saturate a board. The statuses are the same ones the benchmark catalogue shows.

Use this chart

These counts are BenchLeader's own and free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit BenchLeader with a link to this page. The benchmark scores in the tables and CSV remain under each benchmark publisher's own terms.

Embed code

<figure><a href="https://www.benchleader.com/stats/benchmark-saturation"><img src="https://www.benchleader.com/stats/benchmark-saturation.svg" alt="Of the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated and 37 near-saturated: the top models score too close to the ceiling to tell apart." width="760"></a><figcaption>Source: <a href="https://www.benchleader.com/stats/benchmark-saturation">BenchLeader</a>, CC BY 4.0</figcaption></figure>

Download the table (CSV)

Citation

BenchLeader, “AI benchmark saturation statistics”, data as of 2 Nov 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/stats/benchmark-saturation.

Questions people ask

What does it mean when a benchmark is saturated?
The best models all score near the ceiling, so differences between them are noise. BenchLeader marks a percentage-scored board with 10 or more models saturated when its fifth-best model scores 90% or more, and near-saturated when the leader passes 90% or the fifth-best passes 80%.
How many AI benchmarks are saturated?
Of the 253 benchmarks BenchLeader tracks, 29 are saturated and 37 near-saturated: the top models score too close to the ceiling to tell apart. The rest: 165 active and 22 retired.
Which AI benchmarks are hardest?
Among active boards with 10 or more models, GDPx (best score 12%) and Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 (best score 13.1%).
Why use the fifth-best model rather than the top score?
Some trackers call a benchmark saturated when the top model passes 90%. BenchLeader uses the fifth-best model, so one outlier result cannot saturate a board.

Related: all benchmarks, methodology, BenchLeader Index, AI model release statistics, all statistics.