BenchLeader

Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 62.3.
  • Agnes 3.0 Flash is stronger in agents & tools.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning, coding.
  • Agnes 3.0 Flash is 267× cheaper ($0.075 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
MetricAgnes 3.0 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 (high)
BenchLeader Index62.372.0
Agents & tools score76.866.6
Composite score74.094.0
Knowledge score59.183.7
Long context score67.068.4
Reasoning score71.181.0
Coding score74.1
Blended price $/M$0.075$20.00
Output speed55 tok/s
Time to first answer14.7 s
Context window1M1M
Terminal-Bench54.5%
SciCode57.6%
WeirdML92.3%
APEX-Agents44.4%
AA Intelligence Index35.551.2
AA-LCR81.0%83.7%
AA-Omniscience-10.640.8
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.4%90.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)38.5%55.9%
SciCode (AA)51.6%58.7%
ARC-AGI-196.0%
ARC-AGI-288.8%
CritPt15.1%30.3%
GDPval (AA)53.7%57.5%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)47.6%43.1%
MirrorCode73.3%
CursorBench69.4%
ALE-Bench2143.2

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1: questions

Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Claude Fable 5.1?
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 62.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Claude Fable 5.1 for agentic tasks?
Agnes 3.0 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (77 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Claude Fable 5.1?
Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper: $0.075 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.