BenchLeader

Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Verdict
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) leads on quality: 66.2 vs 62.3.
  • Agnes 3.0 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.6 (medium) is stronger in composite, knowledge, coding.
  • Agnes 3.0 Flash is 40× cheaper ($0.075 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
MetricAgnes 3.0 FlashGrok 4.6 (medium)
BenchLeader Index62.366.2
Agents & tools score76.873.3
Composite score74.083.6
Knowledge score59.177.6
Long context score67.067.0
Reasoning score71.167.7
Coding score64.1
Blended price $/M$0.075$3.00
Output speed57 tok/s
Time to first answer34.1 s
Context window1M500k
SciCode54.6%
AA Intelligence Index35.543.0
AA-LCR81.0%81.0%
AA-Omniscience-10.628
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.4%93.5%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)38.5%42.1%
SciCode (AA)51.6%55.9%
ARC-AGI-187.5%
ARC-AGI-261.3%
CritPt15.1%17.7%
GDPval (AA)53.7%57.1%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)47.6%44.3%
DeepSWE67.5%
CursorBench67.1%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Grok 4.6: questions

Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 (medium) leads on quality: 66.2 vs 62.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.6 (medium) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Grok 4.6 for agentic tasks?
Agnes 3.0 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (77 vs 73 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper: $0.075 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Agnes 3.0 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 500k tokens.