Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Claude Opus 5 
Qwen3.6 Plus Verdict
- Claude Opus 5 leads on quality: 70.0 vs 59.2.
- Claude Opus 5 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is stronger in instruction following.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is 8.9× cheaper ($1.13 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 59.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 71.5 | 57.0 |
| Coding score | 74.5 | 52.8 |
| Composite score | 93.1 | 48.3 |
| Human preference score | 78.2 | 63.9 |
| Knowledge score | 70.6 | 59.0 |
| Long context score | 66.2 | 65.7 |
| Maths score | 67.1 | 56.7 |
| Multimodal score | 69.4 | 62.4 |
| Reasoning score | 71.5 | 64.3 |
| Instruction following score | – | 73.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $1.13 |
| Output speed | 51 tok/s | 56 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 93.0 s | 101.1 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.9% | 88.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 38.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 97.8% | 93.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 57.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 44.1% |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | – |
| SciCode | – | 40.7% |
| WeirdML | 86.3% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.6 | 147.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1444 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1468 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1495 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1460 |
| LiveBench | – | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 75.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 78.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 41.4% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 83.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 69.9% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 75.0% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 50.7 | 27.0 |
| IFBench | – | 75.2% |
| AA-LCR | 79.3% | 78.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.7% | 78.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 37.1 | 0.9 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.2% | 88.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 54.9% | 27.9% |
| SciCode (AA) | 56.4% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 97.7% |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 94.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | 89.0% | 86.0% |
| MMLU-Pro | 91.6% | 87.7% |
| IOI | 91.7% | – |
| LegalBench | 87.0% | 84.2% |
| CorpFin | 73.2% | 61.9% |
| TaxEval | 75.1% | 74.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 84.6% | 53.2% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 97.0% | 73.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.4% | 87.4% |
| Vals Index | 67.2 | 32.0 |
| HiL-Bench | 57.0% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.6 Plus: questions
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Claude Opus 5 leads on quality: 70.0 vs 59.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3.6 Plus for coding?
- Claude Opus 5 scores higher in coding (75 vs 53 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3.6 Plus for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (72 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper: $1.13 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Qwen3.6 Plus streams faster: 56 against 51 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.