Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 7
Claude Opus 5 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Claude Opus 5 leads on quality: 70.0 vs 61.3.
- Claude Opus 5 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in instruction following.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is 2.7× cheaper ($3.75 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3 7 (max) streams 3.3× faster (169 vs 51 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 71.5 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 74.5 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 93.1 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 78.2 | 57.2 |
| Knowledge score | 70.6 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 66.2 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 67.1 | 57.4 |
| Multimodal score | 69.4 | – |
| Reasoning score | 71.5 | 66.8 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.6 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 51 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 93.0 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.9% | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 97.8% | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | 70.4% |
| SciCode | – | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 86.3% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.6 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1517 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 50.7 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 79.3% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.7% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 37.1 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.2% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 54.9% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 56.4% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 89.0% | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 91.6% | 89.3% |
| IOI | 91.7% | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | 87.0% | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | 73.2% | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | 75.1% | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 84.6% | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 97.0% | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.4% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | 67.2 | 44.8 |
| HiL-Bench | 57.0% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3 7?
- Claude Opus 5 leads on quality: 70.0 vs 61.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Claude Opus 5 scores higher in coding (75 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 5 better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (72 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 is cheaper: $3.75 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 streams faster: 169 against 51 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.