Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 7
Claude Opus 5.5 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 60.8.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is 2.1× cheaper ($3.75 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3 7 (max) streams 4.1× faster (197 vs 48 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.7 | 60.8 |
| Composite score | 95.0 | 55.4 |
| Knowledge score | 85.0 | 63.4 |
| Long context score | 68.5 | 65.6 |
| Multimodal score | 71.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 95.0 | 66.7 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 49.6 |
| Coding score | – | 60.7 |
| Human preference score | – | 57.1 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.9 |
| Maths score | – | 60.4 |
| Blended price $/M | $8.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 48 tok/s | 197 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 4.2 s | 14.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | – | 48.8% |
| ProofBench | – | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1473 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1517 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.6 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 74.0% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 57.6 | 29.5 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 84.7% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 87.7% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 46.4 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 61.4% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 66.9% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1110 |
| CritPt | 31.7% | 13.4% |
| GDPval (AA) | 67.3% | 30.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 11.8% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 42.5% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 18.8% |
| Code Migration | – | 13.1% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 57.0% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 47.8% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 1.7% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 25.5% |
| MedCode | – | 38.8% |
| MedScribe | – | 79.4% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals) | – | 59.2% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 47.7% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1489 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1444 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1482 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1494 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 19.0% |
| EBR-bench | – | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | – | 32.0% |
| LMCA | – | 44.0% |
| DTBench | – | 92.3% |
| GBAEval | – | 0.4% |
| ALE-Bench | – | 1189.4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 59.6% | 1.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 74.5% |
| AutomationBench | 69.5% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 26.2% | – |
| Harvey LAB | 91.2% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 66.2% | 31.1% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 41.4% | 74.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1822 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-22. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Qwen3 7?
- Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 60.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-22, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 is cheaper: $3.75 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 streams faster: 197 against 48 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.