Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 6
Gemini 3.5 Flash 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (64.1 vs 63.3).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following, long context, maths.
- They cost about the same ($2.96 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) streams 3.7× faster (217 vs 59 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 64.1 | 63.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 68.0 | 72.0 |
| Coding score | 58.9 | 58.2 |
| Composite score | 71.5 | 64.9 |
| Human preference score | 67.8 | 65.9 |
| Instruction following score | 72.5 | 74.2 |
| Knowledge score | 74.0 | 64.0 |
| Long context score | 63.6 | 66.9 |
| Multimodal score | 67.6 | – |
| Reasoning score | 67.1 | 63.2 |
| Maths score | – | 64.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.38 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 217 tok/s | 59 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 15.5 s | 38.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1493 | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1491 | 1479 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.6 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | 74.6% | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 74.3% | 80.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.8 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 39.4% | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.1% | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 41.3% | 30.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.6% | 95.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3 6?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (64.1 vs 63.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3 6 for coding?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in coding (59 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3 6 for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3 6 scores higher in agentic tasks (72 vs 68 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 is cheaper: $2.96 against $3.38 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3 6?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash streams faster: 217 against 59 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 246k tokens.