BenchLeader

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Sol

Full profiles: Gemini 4 Carbon (Google) and GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI): every benchmark, price and rank.

Updated · Data from 9 sources

As of 29 Oct 2026, Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6 Sol are neck and neck on quality (65.1 vs 63.5 on the BenchLeader Index, inside the ±7.0 margin), and GPT-6 Sol is 2.0× cheaper at $4.00 vs $8.00 per 1M tokens blended. Choose Gemini 4 Carbon for reasoning (79 vs 66), knowledge (76 vs 66), and coding (72 vs 67); choose GPT-6 Sol for long context (67 vs 65).

Key facts (as of 29 Oct 2026)

  • Gemini 4 Carbon scores 65.1 on the BenchLeader Index and GPT-6 Sol scores 63.5 (BenchLeader, 29 Oct 2026).
  • Gemini 4 Carbon costs $8.00 per 1M tokens blended (list price, 29 Oct 2026).
  • GPT-6 Sol costs $4.00 per 1M tokens blended (list price, 29 Oct 2026).
  • Of the 15 benchmarks both models have, Gemini 4 Carbon leads 14 (BenchLeader, 29 Oct 2026).

Which to pick for…

The pick's numbers come first. Category scores on the BenchLeader scale (50 is the average model, 15 points one standard deviation). High confidence means a lead of half a standard deviation or more; under one point is called either.

Use casePickWhyConfidence
CodingGemini 4 Carbon72 vs 67 category score; SciCode 64.2% vs 57.6%Medium
ReasoningGemini 4 Carbon79 vs 66 category score; HLE-Diamond (AA) 69.1% vs 45.2%High
KnowledgeGemini 4 Carbon76 vs 66 category scoreHigh
Long documentsGPT-6 Sol67 vs 65 category score; AA-LCR v1.1 83.7% vs 79.3%Medium
Chat quality (human preference)–Only GPT-6 Sol has an Arena rating (65 category score)Not comparable
Lowest costGPT-6 Sol$4.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended; agentic coding session $0.160 vs $0.320–
Fastest first answerEither103.1 s (Gemini 4 Carbon (high)) vs 108.7 s (GPT-6 Sol (max)) to the first answer token–
High volume on a budgetNeither flagshipA smaller model is usually the better fit: Cheapest good LLMs, Fastest LLMs–

Key differences

  • Gemini 4 Carbon (high) and GPT-6 Sol (max) are neck and neck on quality (65.1 vs 63.5, within the ±7.0 margin).
  • Gemini 4 Carbon (high) is stronger in coding, knowledge, reasoning.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in long context, agents & tools, human preference, maths, multimodal.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max) is 2.0× cheaper ($4.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).

At a glance

SpecGemini 4 CarbonGPT-6 Sol
DeveloperGoogleOpenAI
Released28 Oct 202622 Sept 2026
Context window (tokens)1,000,0001,050,000
Compared atGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)
Open weightsNoNo
Price in / out / cached input per 1M$4.00 / $20.00 / –$2.00 / $10.00 / $0.200

Category by category

Category scores on the BenchLeader scale: 50 is the average evaluated model, 15 points is one standard deviation. A gap under one point is called level.

CategoryGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)Leader
Reasoning78.966.4Gemini 4 Carbon
Coding71.767.0Gemini 4 Carbon
Agents & tools–59.8not comparable
Maths–69.0not comparable
Knowledge75.865.7Gemini 4 Carbon
Human preference–64.5not comparable
Multimodal–61.3not comparable
Long context64.566.7GPT-6 Sol

Where sources disagree

Across the 15 benchmarks both have, Gemini 4 Carbon leads 14, GPT-6 Sol leads 1.

Overall indexGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)Leader
BenchLeader Index65.163.5neck and neck

Each publisher runs its own tasks, harnesses and effort settings, so their overall verdicts can differ; BenchLeader reconciles them on one scale. † measured at another effort setting of the same model (the publisher did not test the one compared here).

Price, speed and latency

List prices blended at three input tokens per output token. Per-task prices use the token counts on the methodology page; suite cost is what Artificial Analysis paid to run its whole Intelligence Index.

MeasureGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)
Blended price per 1M tokens$8.00$4.00
Input / output per 1M$4.00 / $20.00$2.00 / $10.00
Cached input per 1M–$0.200
Price per task: chat reply$0.0076$0.0038
Price per task: summarize a 30-page report$0.060$0.030
Price per task: code edit$0.054$0.027
Price per task: agentic coding session$0.320$0.160
Price per task: structured extraction$0.012$0.0060
Cost to run a full benchmark suite$7.76–
Output speed100 tok/s110 tok/s
Time to first answer103.1 s108.7 s
Time to a complete answer108.1 s113.2 s

Each model is compared at its best-ranked reasoning-effort setting. Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 65.1 and takes 103 s to its first answer token. GPT-6 Sol (max) scores 63.5 and takes 109 s to its first answer token; GPT-6 Sol (xhigh) scores 58.8 in 33 s, GPT-6 Sol (high) scores 58.4 in 9 s. Higher effort means more thinking before the answer: better scores, longer waits and more tokens billed. How reasoning effort changes scores and cost.

Every benchmark

99 benchmarks, grouped by category; each name links to the board and its leaders. † measured at another effort setting of the same model, shown for reference and not counted as a win.

MetricPublisherGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)
BenchLeader IndexBenchLeader65.163.5
Coding scoreBenchLeader71.767.0
Knowledge scoreBenchLeader75.865.7
Long context scoreBenchLeader64.566.7
Reasoning scoreBenchLeader78.966.4
Agents & tools scoreBenchLeader–59.8
Human preference scoreBenchLeader–64.5
Maths scoreBenchLeader–69.0
Multimodal scoreBenchLeader–61.3
Blended price $/MBenchLeader$8.00$4.00
Output speedBenchLeader100 tok/s110 tok/s
Time to first answerBenchLeader103.1 s108.7 s
Context windowBenchLeader1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Reasoning
GPQA DiamondEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–94.3%
Arena Hard PromptsArena (LMArena)–1485
LiveBench 1.0 ReasoningLiveBench–88.7%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)Artificial Analysis60.4%47.9%
HLE-Diamond (AA)Artificial Analysis69.1%45.2%
ARC-AGI-1ARC Prize–95.5%
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize–89.6%
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize–23.0%
CritPtArtificial Analysis36.0%30.9%
CritPt v2 hard subset (AA)Artificial Analysis63.0%–
MysteryMechanismVals AI–30.2%
Chess PuzzlesEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–56.0%
Mystery Game PuzzlesEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–56.0%
LMCAEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–59.1%
DTBenchEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–97.3%
Coding
SciCodeSciCode64.2%57.6%
FrontierCodeCognition–49.3%
Arena CodingArena (LMArena)–1519
Arena WebDevArena (LMArena)–1677
LiveBench 1.0 CodingLiveBench–81.8%
IOIVals AI–82.6%
Code MigrationVals AI–57.2%
ProgramBenchVals AI–2.0%
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Vals AI89.1%87.8%
ALE-BenchEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–2462
Show all 99 benchmarks
MetricPublisherGemini 4 Carbon (high)GPT-6 Sol (max)
Coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)Artificial Analysis65.2%43.9%
FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)Artificial Analysis48.5%–
FrontierCode 2.0 (AA)Artificial Analysis40.6%–
Agents & tools
Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench–49.4%
APEX-AgentsMercor–54.3%
Arena AgentArena (LMArena)–8.6
LiveBench Agentic CodingLiveBench–52.9%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)Vals AI–83.2%
ITBench SRE (AA)Artificial Analysis–49.4%
CyberBenchVals AI–78.0%
Finance Agent v2Vals AI–49.0%
Finance Agent v2.1Vals AI67.2%–
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1.1Vals AI17.5%–
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1Vals AI–1.7%
Legal Research BenchVals AI55.8%28.9%
SREBenchVals AI–30.5%
Tax Agent BenchVals AI48.9%15.0%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)Vals AI63.1%44.4%
Terminal-Bench ScienceVals AI–30.0%
Arena SearchArena (LMArena)–1228
Vending-Bench 2Andon Labs16484.2†14427.9†
AutomationBenchArtificial Analysis77.8%61.6%
GDP.pdf (AA)Artificial Analysis28.4%25.2%
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1Harvey–3.6%
AA-Briefcase v1.1Artificial Analysis16091476
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)Artificial Analysis64.8%30.0%
CWE-Bench (AA)Artificial Analysis–64.2%
DeepSec-Bench (AA)Artificial Analysis–46.3%
CyberGym end-to-end (AA)Artificial Analysis–0.0%
FACTS SearchGoogle–86.2%†
Maths
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub–89.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub–90.0%
OTIS Mock AIMEEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–100.0%
ProofBenchVals AI–83.0%†
LiveBench MathematicsLiveBench–96.4%
Arena MathsArena (LMArena)–1450
Knowledge
SimpleQA VerifiedEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–60.7%
LiveBench 1.0 Data AnalysisLiveBench–81.2%
AA-Omniscience v1.1Artificial Analysis53.5–
PRBench LegalScale AI SEAL–38.6%†
BioMysteryBenchVals AI–74.8%
Excel Modeling BenchmarkVals AI–71.5%
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1Vals AI76.5%–
MedCodeVals AI–47.1%
MedScribeVals AI–82.0%
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Vals AI–56.6%
EBR-benchEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–53.3%
GDP.pdfEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–26.4%
AA-Omniscience v1.1: accuracyArtificial Analysis58.3%–
AA-Omniscience v1.1: non-hallucinationArtificial Analysis88.6%–
Instruction following
LiveBench LanguageLiveBench–85.3%
LiveBench Instruction FollowingLiveBench–68.6%
Arena Instruction FollowingArena (LMArena)–1450
Human preference
Arena TextArena (LMArena)–1459
Arena Creative WritingArena (LMArena)–1435
Arena Multi-turnArena (LMArena)–1468
Arena Longer QueriesArena (LMArena)–1468
Multimodal
Arena VisionArena (LMArena)–1240
MMMU-ProArtificial Analysis–83.0%
Blueprint-Bench 2Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub58.6%†36.9%†
AA-3DArtificial Analysis–1121
Long context
AA-LCR v1.1Artificial Analysis79.3%83.7%
MLCRArtificial Analysis–33.9%
Composite
Epoch Capabilities IndexEpoch AI Benchmarking Hub–163.7†
LiveBench 1.0LiveBench–79.3%
AA Intelligence Index v5.0Artificial Analysis59.4–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2Artificial Analysis–47.6
AA Progress Index v1Artificial Analysis351.6334
Vals IndexVals AI70.4–
Vals Finance IndexVals AI66.3%–
Vals RSI IndexVals AI–28.1%
Vals Science IndexVals AI–45.0%
AA Cyber IndexArtificial Analysis–36.8
Safety & honesty
FORTRESSScale AI SEAL–13.5%†

Data as of 2026-10-29. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

What changed

  • GPT-6 Sol (max): BenchLeader Index 64.1 → 63.5.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 2 new results (AA Progress Index v1, HLE-Diamond (AA)).
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 1 score revision.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 3 new results (Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1, Vals RSI Index, Vals Science Index).
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 1 score revision.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 2 score revisions.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 3 new results (GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1: accuracy, AA-Omniscience v1.1: non-hallucination).
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 1 score revision.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 1 new result (SREBench); 2 score revisions.
  • GPT-6 Sol (max): 2 new results (Chess Puzzles, Arena Search); 3 score revisions.

Rankings: Best LLM overall · Best LLM for coding · Best LLM for agents · Best cheap LLMs

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Sol: questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than GPT-6 Sol?
Gemini 4 Carbon (high) and GPT-6 Sol (max) are neck and neck on quality (65.1 vs 63.5, within the ±7.0 margin). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; the two are within the margin of error as of 29 Oct 2026, so check the category scores for your use.
Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Sol: which is cheaper, and will that change?
GPT-6 Sol is cheaper today: $4.00 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token. No price change has been announced for either.
Is Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher in coding (72 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average). On SciCode, the top shared coding benchmark, it is 64.2% for Gemini 4 Carbon against 57.6% for GPT-6 Sol.
Which is faster, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol streams faster (110 vs 100 output tokens per second, Artificial Analysis 7-day median).
Which is better for long documents?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on long-context benchmarks (67 vs 65). Both take about 1.1M tokens: Gemini 4 Carbon 1,000,000, GPT-6 Sol 1,050,000.
More questions (3)
Which has lower latency?
Gemini 4 Carbon answers first: 103.1 s against 108.7 s to the first answer token, as Artificial Analysis measures it. Reasoning effort drives most of this: a higher setting thinks longer before it answers.
Do independent benchmarks agree on Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Sol?
Across the 15 benchmarks both have, Gemini 4 Carbon leads 14, GPT-6 Sol leads 1.
When was Gemini 4 Carbon released?
Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 28 Oct 2026.