GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3 6
GPT-6 Sol 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.7 vs 63.0.
- GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is 1.3× cheaper ($2.96 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
- GPT-6 Sol (max) streams 1.9× faster (126 vs 65 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (max) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 67.7 | 63.0 |
| Composite score | 86.2 | 63.2 |
| Knowledge score | 75.4 | 63.5 |
| Long context score | 67.7 | 66.1 |
| Multimodal score | 67.1 | – |
| Reasoning score | 95.0 | 58.9 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 71.9 |
| Coding score | – | 58.1 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.7 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.4 |
| Maths score | – | 66.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 126 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 107.2 s | 34.0 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1479 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 47.5 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 83.7% | 80.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.3% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.1 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 47.9% | 30.8% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.6% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
| CritPt | 30.9% | 3.7% |
| GDPval (AA) | 49.4% | – |
| CaseLaw v2 | – | 47.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals) | – | 51.7% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1475 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1438 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1469 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1474 |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 20.0% |
| LMCA | – | 42.5% |
| DTBench | – | 87.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | – | 4254.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 43.9% | – |
| AutomationBench | 61.6% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 24.8% | – |
| MLCR | 16.1% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 54.5% | 37.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 39.9% | 53.8% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1483 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3 6?
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 67.7 vs 63.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 is cheaper: $2.96 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3 6?
- GPT-6 Sol streams faster: 126 against 65 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 246k tokens.