BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 are level on quality (65.5 vs 64.7).
  • Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in coding, composite, instruction following.
  • They cost about the same ($10.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8
BenchLeader Index65.564.7
Agents & tools score69.465.0
Coding score64.865.7
Composite score80.381.9
Human preference score68.865.6
Instruction following score58.561.6
Knowledge score66.466.3
Long context score65.965.3
Maths score65.2
Multimodal score65.764.4
Reasoning score66.364.2
Blended price $/M$10.00$10.00
Output speed46 tok/s58 tok/s
Time to first answer21.2 s29.5 s
Context window1M1M
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%
Terminal-Bench80.2%
SimpleBench61.7%64.8%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
WeirdML76.4%
FrontierCode38.5%46.5%
GSO-Bench44.1%47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.3158.3
LMArena Text14951473
LMArena Hard Prompts15191503
LMArena Coding15471527
LMArena WebDev15571540
LMArena Vision13171289
AA Intelligence Index40.742.0
IFBench58.6%62.2%
AA-LCR78.7%77.7%
MMMU-Pro78.8%
AA-Omniscience27.328.8
Terminal-Bench Hard51.5%58.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)91.4%92.0%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)42.3%48.7%
SciCode (AA)54.4%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)88.6%94.4%
AIME (Vals)96.3%
LiveCodeBench85.1%87.8%
MMLU-Pro89.9%89.6%
IOI47.1%
LegalBench85.3%83.6%
CorpFin66.1%66.7%
TaxEval75.3%75.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)68.5%71.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)82.0%88.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)90.2%92.4%
Vals Index56.160.9
HiL-Bench41.7%35.3%
EQ-Bench 413111281
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.3%

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.