Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Claude Opus 4.7 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.1 are level on quality (65.5 vs 64.9).
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, long context, maths, multimodal.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in coding, instruction following, knowledge, reasoning.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is 5.0× cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 4.2× faster (194 vs 46 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.5 | 64.9 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.4 | 62.7 |
| Coding score | 64.8 | 68.2 |
| Composite score | 80.3 | 72.2 |
| Human preference score | 68.8 | 66.0 |
| Instruction following score | 58.5 | 77.8 |
| Knowledge score | 66.4 | 73.1 |
| Long context score | 65.9 | 65.3 |
| Maths score | 65.2 | 52.2 |
| Multimodal score | 65.7 | 64.9 |
| Reasoning score | 66.3 | 68.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 46 tok/s | 194 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 21.2 s | 2.0 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 57.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | – |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | – |
| SciCode | – | 58.2% |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | – |
| APEX-Agents | – | 41.9% |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 39.0% |
| GSO-Bench | 44.1% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.3 | 154.6 |
| LMArena Text | 1495 | 1492 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1519 | 1511 |
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | 1541 |
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | 1293 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -2.6 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 40.7 | 34.3 |
| IFBench | 58.6% | – |
| AA-LCR | 78.7% | 77.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 78.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.3 | 28.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 51.5% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.4% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 46.2% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 58.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 88.6% | – |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.3% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 85.1% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 89.9% | – |
| IOI | 47.1% | – |
| LegalBench | 85.3% | – |
| CorpFin | 66.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 75.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | – |
| Vals Index | 56.1 | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 57.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.6% |
| HiL-Bench | 41.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | 1260 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.3% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.