BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.8 leads on quality: 64.7 vs 62.6.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, instruction following, multimodal.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is stronger in coding, knowledge, long context, reasoning, maths.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is 5.0× cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • Muse Spark 1.2 streams 3.8× faster (219 vs 58 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Muse Spark 1.2
BenchLeader Index64.762.6
Agents & tools score65.0
Coding score65.766.5
Composite score81.979.1
Human preference score65.6
Instruction following score61.6
Knowledge score66.376.9
Long context score65.366.0
Multimodal score64.4
Reasoning score64.270.2
Maths score54.3
Blended price $/M$10.00$2.00
Output speed58 tok/s219 tok/s
Time to first answer29.5 s23.7 s
Context window1M1.0M
SimpleBench64.8%74.5%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
FrontierCode46.5%
ProofBench43.0%
GSO-Bench47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.3155.5
LMArena Text1473
LMArena Hard Prompts1503
LMArena Coding1527
LMArena WebDev1540
LMArena Vision1289
AA Intelligence Index42.039.8
IFBench62.2%
AA-LCR77.7%79.0%
AA-Omniscience28.827.2
Terminal-Bench Hard58.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.0%90.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%45.5%
SciCode (AA)54.4%57.4%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)94.4%
LiveCodeBench87.8%
MMLU-Pro89.6%
IOI49.5%
LegalBench83.6%
CorpFin66.7%
TaxEval75.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)71.9%
SWE-bench (Vals)88.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.4%
Vals Index60.9
HiL-Bench35.3%
EQ-Bench 41281

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.