BenchLeader

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 5 leads on quality: 70.0 vs 63.9.
  • Claude Opus 5 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is stronger in knowledge, instruction following.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is 3.0× cheaper ($3.38 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) streams 4.0× faster (209 vs 52 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
BenchLeader Index70.063.9
Agents & tools score71.667.8
Coding score74.458.9
Composite score92.971.4
Human preference score78.267.4
Knowledge score70.573.9
Long context score66.263.6
Maths score67.1
Multimodal score69.467.6
Reasoning score71.166.8
Instruction following score72.2
Blended price $/M$10.00$3.38
Output speed52 tok/s209 tok/s
Time to first answer81.6 s17.0 s
Context window1M1M
GPQA Diamond92.9%
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%
SimpleBench80.6%
WeirdML86.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index162.6
LMArena Text1476
LMArena Hard Prompts1493
LMArena Coding1503
LMArena WebDev1491
LMArena Vision1306
AA Intelligence Index50.733.6
IFBench74.6%
AA-LCR79.3%74.3%
MMMU-Pro84.7%83.9%
AA-Omniscience37.120.8
Terminal-Bench Hard39.4%
GPQA Diamond (AA)93.2%92.1%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)54.9%41.3%
SciCode (AA)56.4%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)95.6%
LiveCodeBench89.0%
MMLU-Pro91.6%
IOI91.7%
LegalBench87.0%
CorpFin73.2%
TaxEval75.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)84.6%
SWE-bench (Vals)97.0%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)93.4%
Vals Index67.2
HiL-Bench57.0%
EQ-Bench 41385

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.